Tevi chimeric endonuclease and their preferential cleavage sites

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a method to cleave target nucleic acid sequence by the catalytic domain of a GIY-YIG homing endonucleases 1-Tevl. More precisely, the invention relates to the deciphering of new preferential 1-Tevl cleavage sites for efficient and specific cleavage activity. The invention concerns a method for the generation of TevI specific chimeric endonucleases to target nucleic acid sequence including such cleavage sites and methods of using same for gene editing.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application claims priority, including priority claims under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) and §120, to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/759,728 filed Feb. 1, 2013.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method to cleave target nucleic acid sequence by the catalytic domain of a GIY-YIG homing endonucleases I-Tevl. More precisely, the invention relates to the deciphering of new preferential I-Tevl cleavage sites for efficient and specific cleavage activity. The invention concerns a method for the generation of Tevl specific chimeric endonucleases to target nucleic acid sequence including such cleavage sites and methods of using same for gene editing.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Genome engineering requires the consolidation of many diverse concepts (Silva, Poirot et al. 2011), the most fundamental being the need to specifically and efficiently target a DNA sequence within a complex genome. Re-engineering a DNA binding protein for this purpose has been mainly limited to few semi-modular archetypes (Pingoud and Wende 2011) such as artificial zinc-finger proteins (ZFP), the naturally occurring LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases (LHE), and the chimeric Transcription Activator Like Effectors nuclease (TALEN).

Meganucleases, also called homing endonucleases (HEs), can be divided into five families based on sequence and structure motifs: LAGLIDADG, GIY-YIG, HNH, His-Cys box and PD-(D/E)XK (Stoddard 2005; Zhao, Bonocora et al. 2007). The most well studied family is that of the LAGLIDADG proteins, with a considerable body of biochemical, genetic and structural work having established that these endonucleases could be used as molecular tools (Stoddard, Monnat et al. 2007; Arnould, Delenda et al. 2011). Although numerous engineering efforts have focused on LAGLIDADG HEs, members from two other families, GIY-YIG and HNH, are of particular interest. Biochemical and structural studies have established that in both families, member proteins can adopt a bipartite fold with distinct functional domains: (1) a catalytic domain responsible mainly for DNA cleavage, and; (2) a DNA-binding domain to provide target specificity (Stoddard 2005; Marcaida, Munoz et al. 2010).

Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), generated by fusing Zinc-finger-based DNA-binding domains to an independent catalytic domain (Kim, Cha et al. 1996; Smith, Berg et al. 1999; Smith, Bibikova et al. 2000), represent another type of engineered nuclease commonly used to stimulate gene targeting and have been successfully used to induce gene correction, gene insertion, and gene deletion. The archetypal ZFNs are based on the catalytic domain of the Type IIS restriction enzyme Fokl and Zinc Finger-based DNA binding domains made of strings of 3 or 4 individual Zinc Fingers, each recognizing a DNA triplet (Pabo, Peisach et al. 2001). Two Zinc Finger-Fokl monomers have to bind to their respective Zinc Finger DNA-recognition sites on opposite strands in an inverted orientation in order to form a catalytically active dimer that catalyze double strand cleavage (Bitinaite, Wah et al. 1998).

Recently, a new class of chimeric nuclease using a Fokl catalytic domain has been described (Christian, Cermak et al. 2010; Li, Huang et al. 2011). The DNA binding domain of these nucleases is derived from Transcription Activator Like Effectors (TALE), a family of proteins used in the infection process by plant pathogens of the Xanthomonas genus. In these DNA binding domains, sequence specificity is driven by a series of 33-35 amino acids repeats, differing essentially by the two positions. Each base pair in the DNA target is contacted by a single repeat, with the specificity resulting from the two variant amino acids of the repeat (the so-called repeat variable dipeptide, RVD). The apparent modularity of these DNA binding domains has been confirmed to a certain extent by modular assembly of designed TALE-derived protein with new specificities (Boch, Scholze et al. 2009; Moscou and Bogdanove 2009). As such, DNA cleavage by a TALEN requires two DNA recognition regions flanking an unspecific central region.

One notable constraint imposed by Fokl nuclease domain is the requirement to function as a dimer to efficiently cleave DNA. For any given DNA target, this necessitates the design of two distinct ZFNs or two TALENs, such that each pair of zinc finger or TAL effector domains is oriented for Fokl dimerization and DNA cleavage (Kleinstiver, Wolfs et al. 2012).

To overcome these drawbacks, the inventors and others have recently developed new types of monomeric chimeric endonucleases, in which DNA binding domain such as Zinc Finger, Homing Endonuclease (Kleinstiver, Wolfs et al. 2012) and TALE (International PCT application WO2012/138927) was fused to a monomeric catalytic domain.

In considering design possibilities for the monomeric chimeric endonuclease, the inventors reasoned that a low affinity cleavage domain that retained some sequence specificity would alleviate accidental off-site cleavage events resulting from DNA proximity during target-site scanning by the DNA binding domain. The inventors chose a homing endonuclease member of the GIY-YIG protein family, I-Tevl (Mueller, Smith et al. 1995; Edgell, Stanger et al. 2004). By contrast to Fok1, I-Tevl endonuclease do not require dimerization for DNA processing activity, thereby alleviating the need for “dual” target sites with intervening DNA “spacers” as for current TAL-nucleases and Zing-finger nucleases.

I-Tevl exhibits a tripartite protein layout wherein an N-terminal catalytic domain is tethered by a long, flexible linker to a minimal C-terminal DNA binding domain. In the protein-DNA interaction the C-terminal domain is responsible for binding specificity as well as the majority of the complex affinity. However, the N-terminal I-Tevl catalytic domain has been described as having its own DNA cleavage selectivity (Dean, Stanger et al. 2002), which interferes with the overall specificity of the chimeric endonuclease. This cleavage specificity reduces the number of possible nucleic acid sequences that can be targeted by the chimeric endonucleases.

I-Tevl catalytic domain has been characterized biochemically in vitro as being specific to the CAACGC natural target sequence and, to a certain extend to sequences defined by the degenerate CN↑NN↓G motif, where arrows represent bottom (↑) and top (↓) strand cleavage. This general motif theoretically increases the number of potential cleavage sites.

However, the inventors have observed dramatic variation in efficacy of targeted gene disruption by Tevl chimeric endonuclease using the above motif. It has appeared that targeting any sequences corresponding to this motif, often result into poor cleavage activity.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have shown that variations in the CNNNG motif modulate I-Tevl nuclease activity. These results contrast with recently published reports suggesting equivalence in cleavage for all CNNNG motif target (Kleinstiver, Wolfs et al. 2012). These data allow determining appropriate cleavage site to be efficiently cleaved by Tevl chimeric endonucleases, using various types of nucleic acid binding domains.

The present invention thus concerns the characterization of new I-Tevl cleavage sites that allow obtaining efficient cleavage activity using I-Tevl catalytic domain. More specifically, the present invention relates to method to design an I-Tevl chimeric endonuclease capable of targeting these cleavage sites, and efficiently process target nucleic acid sequence comprising said cleavage sites. Moreover, the inventors determined optimal chimeric endonuclease scaffolds to process such nucleic acid sequences. The present invention also concerns host cells, non human transgenic animal and transgenic plant obtained by using the chimeric endonucleases designed according to the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1: Statistical analysis of Tevl::TALE nuclease activity in yeast on targets (SEQ ID NO: 346 to SEQ ID NO: 404) comprising the I-Tevl cleavage site (SEQ ID NO: 17) separated from the T0 of the TALE recognition site by a spacer of 10 nucleotides differing by a NNN motif at the 3 first positions of their spacer (a: position 1; b: position 2; c: position 3).

FIG. 2 a: Activity of the TevM01::cT11 construct in mammalian cells (CHO-K1) on a chromosomal target measured as a reduction in GFP fluorescence.

FIG. 2 b: Activity of the TevM01::cT11N3H and TevM01::cT40N3H constructs compared to TevM01::cT11 construct in mammalian cells (CHO-K1) on a chromosomal target measured as a reduction in GFP fluorescence.

FIG. 2 c: Target mutagenesis induced by the Tevl::TALE::scTrex2 fusion measured by EndoT7 assay.

FIG. 2 d: Target gene insertion frequency of the Tevl::TALE on the endogenous target CD52 in HEK-293 cells

FIG. 3 a: Activity of the TevM01::b36 construct in mammalian cells (CHO-K1) on a chromosomal target measured as a reduction in GFP fluorescence.

FIG. 3 b: Targeted mutagenesis activity of different scaffolds for Tevl::b36 at the SH6 locus.

FIG. 3 c: Targeted gene insertion activity for Tevl::b36 on SH6 endogenous target in HEK-293 cells.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TABLES

Table 1: List of nucleic acid target sequences containing a DNA binding domain site and a I-Tevl cleavage site spaced from 0 to 50 bp.

Table 2: Activity of Tevl chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on targets containing a single AvrBs3 recognition site and the I-Tevl cleavage sequence CAACGC spaced from 0 to 50 bps away from the T0.

Table 3: High activity of Tevl chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on a series of I-Tevl cleavage sites.

Table 4: Medium activity of Tevl chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on a series of I-Tevl cleavage sites.

Table 5: Low and no activity of Tevl chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on a series of I-Tevl cleavage sites.

Table 6: Activity of TevM01 TALE nuclease in yeast (37° C.) on a serie of targets containing different spacer sequences.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Unless specifically defined herein, all technical and scientific terms used have the same meaning as commonly understood by a skilled artisan in the fields of gene therapy, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional techniques of cell biology, cell culture, molecular biology, transgenic biology, microbiology, recombinant DNA, and immunology, which are within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. See, for example, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Frederick M. AUSUBEL, 2000, Wiley and son Inc, Library of Congress, USA); Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Third Edition, (Sambrook et al, 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press); Oligonucleotide Synthesis (M. J. Gait ed., 1984); Mullis et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,683,195; Nucleic Acid Hybridization (B. D. Harries & S. J. Higgins eds. 1984); Transcription And Translation (B. D. Hames & S. J. Higgins eds. 1984); Culture Of Animal Cells (R. I. Freshney, Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1987); Immobilized Cells And Enzymes (IRL Press, 1986); B. Perbal, A Practical Guide To Molecular Cloning (1984); the series, Methods In ENZYMOLOGY (J. Abelson and M. Simon, eds.-in-chief, Academic Press, Inc., New York), specifically, Vols. 154 and 155 (Wu et al. eds.) and Vol. 185, “Gene Expression Technology” (D. Goeddel, ed.); Gene Transfer Vectors For Mammalian Cells (J. H. Miller and M. P. Calos eds., 1987, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory); Immunochemical Methods In Cell And Molecular Biology (Mayer and Walker, eds., Academic Press, London, 1987); Handbook Of Experimental Immunology, Volumes I-IV (D. M. Weir and C. C. Blackwell, eds., 1986); and Manipulating the Mouse Embryo, (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y., 1986).

I-Tevl Preferential Cleavage Sites

The present invention relates to the deciphering of new preferential I-Tevl cleavage sites. These cleavage sites are more appropriate to be cleaved by the catalytic domain of I-Tevl, particularly when the latter is fused with a nucleic acid binding domain or a protein that specifies a target nucleic acid sequence in order to form a chimeric endonuclease. Said preferential cleavage sites are those selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO: 117 as shown in Table 3 and 4, and more preferably from SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO: 55 as shown in Table 3.

I-Tevl cleavage sites were primarily defined in the art by the degenerate CN↑NN↓G motif, where arrows represent bottom (↑) and top (↓) strand cleavage and N represents any nucleotide bases. However, the inventors have shown that most sites characterized by this motif did not efficiently result into cleavage upon testing with different scaffolds of Tevl chimeric endonucleases, in particular TAL-Tevl and MBBD-Tevl fusions (see examples). By contrast, the preferential I-Tevl cleavage sites of the present invention have proven ability to be cleaved by different Tevl chimeric endonucleases, which makes them more universal ones.

I-Tevl catalytic domain corresponds to the protein domain or module of I-Tevl enzyme containing the active site of said enzyme; by active site is intended the part of said enzyme at which catalysis of the substrate occurs. In the scope of the present invention, I-Tevl catalytic domain can provide a nuclease activity. By “nuclease catalytic domain” is intended the protein domain comprising the active site of an endonuclease enzyme. Such nuclease catalytic domain can be, for instance, a “cleavase domain” or a “nickase domain”. By “cleavage domain” is intended a protein domain whose catalytic activity generates a Double Strand Break (DSB) in a DNA target. By “nickase domain” is intended a protein domain whose catalytic activity generates a single strand break in a DNA target sequence.

Said catalytic domain is I-Tevl or a variant thereof. In a preferred embodiment, said catalytic domain is a variant of catalytic domain of I-Tevl designed from the N-terminal region of I-Tevl. Said catalytic domain comprises a part of the protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 257. In a preferred embodiment, said I-Tevl catalytic domain corresponds to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 268 or SEQ ID NO: 284. Alternatively, amino acid sequence variants of the I-Tevl catalytic domain can be prepared by mutations in the DNA which encodes the catalytic domain. Such variants include, for example, deletions from, or insertions or substitutions of, residues within the amino acid sequence. Any combination of deletions, insertions, and substitutions may also be made to arrive at the final construct, provided that the final construct possesses the desired activity. In another preferred embodiment, said catalytic domain of I-Tevl according to the present invention comprises a part of the protein sequence having at least 80%, more preferably 90%, again more preferably 95% amino acid sequence identity with the protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 257. In a more preferred embodiment, said catalytic domain of I-Tevl comprises a protein sequence having at least 80%, more preferably 90%, again more preferably 95% amino acid sequence identity with the protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 268 or the protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 284.

Generation of Tevl Chimeric Endonuclease

By selecting the above cleavage sites, one skilled in the art is able to design Tevl chimeric endonculeases to precisely target nucleotide sequences that include such cleavage sites.

This method to generate Tevl chimeric endonuclease according to the invention comprises, for instance, the steps of:

-   -   a) Determining a target nucleic acid sequence comprising a         I-Tevl cleavage site selected from the group consisting of: SEQ         ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO: 117, preferably SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID         NO: 55;     -   b) Selecting or engineering at least one nucleic acid binding         domain to specifically bind a recognition site adjacent to said         cleavage site;

Fusing said nucleic acid binding domain with at least one catalytic domain of I-Tevl. By chimeric endonuclease is meant any fusion proteins comprising at least one catalytic domain of an endonuclease and at least one nucleic acid binding domain or protein specifying a nucleic acid target sequence. Tev-l chimeric endonuclease according to the invention is a fusion protein comprising at least one I-Tevl catalytic domain.

The nucleic acid binding domain is generally a RNA or DNA-binding domain formed by an independently folded polypeptide protein domain that contains at least one motif that recognizes double- or single-stranded polynucleotides. Said nucleic acid binding domain preferably recognizes a specific nucleic acid sequence named recognition site.

Many such polypeptides have been described in the art having the ability to bind specific nucleic acid sequences. Such binding domains often comprise, as non limiting examples, helix-turn helix domains, leucine zipper domains, winged helix domains, helix-loop-helix domains, HMG-box domains, Immunoglobin domains and B3 domain.

As far as nucleic acid binding domains are concerned, those from homing endonuclease also known as meganuclease (Paques and Duchateau 2007) have been widely investigated by the inventors and are well documented in the art (see e.g. (Stoddard, Monnat et al. 2007)).

Homing endonucleases recognize a nucleic acid target sequence and can generate by themselves a single- or double-strand break. However, they can be engineered only to retain binding activity and not cleavage activity to form DNA binding polyopeptides. Homing endonucleases are highly specific, recognizing DNA target sites ranging from 12 to 45 base pairs (bp) in length, usually ranging from 14 to 40 bp in length.

Such homing endonuclease may for example correspond to a LAGLIDADG endonuclease, to a HNH endonuclease, or to a GIY-YIG endonuclease. Examples of such endonuclease include I-Sce I, I-Chu I, I-Cre I, I-Csm I, PI-Sce I, PI-Tli I, PI-Mtu I, I-Ceu I, I-Sce II, I-Sce III, HO, PI-Civ I, PI-Ctr I, PI-Aae I, PI-Bsu I, PI-Dha I, PI-Dra I, PI-May I, PI-Mch I, PI-Mfu I, PI-Mfl I, PI-Mga I, PI-Mgo I, PI-Min I, PI-Mka I, PI-Mle I, PI-Mma I, PI-Msh I, PI-Msm I, PI-Mth I, PI-Mtu I, PI-Mxe I, PI-Npu I, I-Onul, PI-Pfu I, PI-Rma I, PI-Spb I, PI-Ssp I, PI-Fac I, PI-Mja I, PI-Pho I, PI-Tag I, PI-Thy I, PI-Tko I, PI-Tsp I or I-Msol.

In a preferred embodiment, the homing endonuclease is a wild type or a variant of a LAGLIDADG endonuclease such as I-Scel, I-Crel, I-Ceul, I-Msol, and I-Dmol. In a most preferred embodiment, said LAGLIDADG endonuclease is I-Crel. Wild-type I-Crel is a homodimeric homing endonuclease that is capable of cleaving a 22 to 24 bp double-stranded target sequence.

A “variant” endonuclease, i.e. an endonuclease that does not naturally exist in nature and that is obtained by genetic engineering or by random mutagenesis can bind DNA sequences different from that recognized by wild-type endonucleases (see WO2006097854).

Other binding domains can be zinc finger domains. In this case, the resulting Tevl chimeric endonuclease corresponds to the fusion of engineered zinc finger domain with the I-Tevl catalytic domain. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the nucleic acid binding domain is derived from a Transcription Activator like Effector (TALE), wherein sequence specificity is driven by a series of 33-35 amino acids repeats originating from Xanthomonas or Ralstonia bacterial proteins. These repeats differ essentially by two amino acids positions that specify an interaction with a base pair (Boch, Scholze et al. 2009; Moscou and Bogdanove 2009). Each base pair in the DNA target is contacted by a single repeat, with the specificity resulting from the two variant amino acids of the repeat (the so-called repeat variable dipeptide, RVD). TALE binding domains may further comprise a N-terminal translocation domain responsible for the requirement of a first thymine base (T₀) of the targeted sequence and a C-terminal domain that containing a nuclear localization signals (NLS). A TALE nucleic acid binding domain generally corresponds to an engineered core TALE scaffold comprising a plurality of TALE repeat sequence, each repeat comprising a RVD specific to each nucleotides base of a TALE recognition site. In the present invention, each TALE repeat sequence of said core scaffold is made of 30 to 42 amino acids, more preferably 33 or 34 wherein two critical amino acids (the so-called repeat variable dipeptide, RVD) located at positions 12 and 13 mediates the recognition of one nucleotide of said TALE binding site sequence; equivalent two critical amino acids can be located at positions other than 12 and 13 specially in TALE repeat sequence taller than 33 or 34 amino acids long. Preferably, RVDs associated with recognition of the different nucleotides are HD for recognizing C, NG for recognizing T, NI for recognizing A, NN for recognizing G or A, NS for recognizing A, C, G or T, HG for recognizing T, IG for recognizing T, NK for recognizing G, HA for recognizing C, ND for recognizing C, HI for recognizing C, HN for recognizing G, NA for recognizing G, SN for recognizing G or A and YG for recognizing T, TL for recognizing A, VT for recognizing A or G and SW for recognizing A. More preferably, RVDs associated with recognition of the nucleotides C, T, A, G/A and G respectively are selected from the group consisting of NN or NK for recognizing G, HD for recognizing C, NG for recognizing T and NI for recognizing A, TL for recognizing A, VT for recognizing A or G and SW for recognizing A. In another embodiment, RVDS associated with recognition of the nucleotide C are selected from the group consisting of N* and RVDS associated with recognition of the nucleotide T are selected from the group consisting of N* and H*, where * denotes a gap in the repeat sequence that corresponds to a lack of amino acid residue at the second position of the RVD. In another embodiment, critical amino acids 12 and 13 can be mutated towards other amino acid residues in order to modulate their specificity towards nucleotides A, T, C and G and in particular to enhance this specificity. By other amino acid residues is intended any of the twenty natural amino acid residues or unnatural amino acids derivatives.

A TALE nucleic acid binding domain usually comprises between 8 and 30 TALE repeat sequences. More preferably, said core scaffold of the present invention comprises between 8 and 20 TALE repeat sequences; again more preferably 15 TALE repeat sequences. It can also comprise an additional single truncated TALE repeat sequence made of 20 amino acids located at the C-terminus of said set of TALE repeat sequences, i.e. an additional C-terminal half-TALE repeat sequence. The TALE nucleic acid binding domains according to the present invention preferably comprise the protein sequences selected from the group consisting of ST1 (SEQ ID NO: 258) and ST2 (SEQ ID NO: 259). In another embodiment, said engineered TAL binding domain comprises a protein sequence having at least 80%, more preferably 90%, again more preferably 95% amino acid sequence identity with the protein sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 258 and SEQ ID NO: 259.

In another embodiment, said engineered TALE binding domain according to the present invention comprises the protein sequences selected from the group consisting of bT1-Avr (SEQ ID NO: 260), bT2-Avr (SEQ ID NO: 261), bT1-Pth (SEQ ID NO: 262) and bT2-Pth (SEQ ID NO: 263). In another embodiment, said TALE binding domain comprises a protein sequence having at least 80%, more preferably 90%, again more preferably 95% amino acid sequence identity with the protein sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 260 to SEQ ID NO: 263.

In a preferred embodiment according to the method of the present invention, said additional N-terminal and C-terminal domains of engineered TALE binding domains are derived from natural TALE. In a more preferred embodiment said additional N-terminal and C-terminal domains of engineered core TALE scaffold are derived from natural TALE like AvrBs3, PthXo1, AvrHah1, PthA, Talk as non-limiting examples. In another more preferred embodiment, said additional N-terminal and/or said C-terminal domains are truncated forms of respective N-terminal and/or said C-terminal domains of natural TALE like AvrBs3, PthXo1, AvrHah1, PthA, Talk as non-limiting examples from which they are derived. In a more preferred embodiment, said additional N-terminal and C-terminal domains sequences of engineered core TALE scaffold are selected from the group consisting of ST1 SEQ ID NO: 258 and ST2 SEQ ID NO: 259 as respectively exemplified in baseline protein scaffolds bT1-Avr (SEQ ID NO: 260) or bT1-Pth (SEQ ID NO: 261) and bT2-Avr (SEQ ID NO: 262) or bT2-Pth (SEQ ID NO: 263).

Other engineered nucleic acid binding domains are modular base-per-base specific nucleic acid binding domains (MBBBD) (PCT application: PCT/US2013/051783). Said MBBBD can be engineered, for instance, from the newly identified proteins, namely EAV36_BURRH, E5AW43_BURRH, E5AW45_BURRH and E5AW46_BURRH proteins from the recently sequenced genome of the endosymbiont fungi Burkholderia Rhizoxinica (Lackner, Moebius et al. 2011).

MBBBD proteins comprise modules of about 31 to 33 amino acids that are base specific. These modules display less than 40% sequence identity with Xanthomonas TALE common repeats, whereas they present more polypeptides sequence variability. When they are assembled together, these modular polypeptides can although target specific nucleic acid sequences in a quite similar fashion as Xanthomonas TAL-nucleases.

According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, an engineered MBBBD binding domain comprising between 10 and 30 modules, preferably between 16 and 20 modules, is used as a DNA binding domain in the Tevl chimeric endonucleases. Such DNA binding domain can comprise at least a part of protein sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 264 to SEQ ID NO: 267. In a more preferred embodiment, said DNA binding domain comprises a part of protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 267. In another embodiment, said engineered MBBBD binding domain comprises a protein sequence having at least 80%, more preferably 90%, again more preferably 95% amino acid sequence identity with the protein sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 264 to SEQ ID NO: 267. The different domains from the above proteins (modules, N and C-terminals) from Burkholderia and Xanthomonas are useful to engineer new proteins or scaffolds having binding properties to specific nucleic acid sequences. In particular, additional N-terminal and C-terminal domains of engineered MBBBD can be derived from natural TALE like AvrBs3, PthXo1, AvrHah1, PthA, Talk as non-limiting examples.

According to the present invention, I-Tevl catalytic domain might be fused at the N-terminal part or at the C-terminal part of the above nucleic acid binding domains. I-Tevl catalytic domain can be fused to the nucleic acid binding domain by a peptide linker. Peptide linker acts as a communication device between the nucleic acid binding domain and I-Tevl catalytic domain to act in concert for nucleic acid cleavage. Said peptide linker is a peptide sequence which allows the connection of different monomers in a fusion protein and the adoption of the correct conformation for said fusion protein activity and which does not alter the specificity of either of the monomers for their targets. Peptide linkers can be of various sizes, from 2 amino acids to 50 amino acids as a non limiting indicative range. Peptide linkers can also be structured or unstructured.

Tevl chimeric endonuclease according to the invention thus interacts with at least two regions in the target nucleic acid sequence: the recognition site and the cleavage site. Optimal distances in the target nucleic acid sequence for the relative positioning of the binding and cleavage modules in the Tevl chimeric endonuclease have to be determined. Thus, the present invention relates to a method further comprises determining target nucleic acid sequence that comprises a recognition site spaced away from said I-Tevl cleavage site by an optimal distance to increase nucleic acid processing activity.

Increased DNA processing activity refers to an increase in the detected level of chimeric endonuclease processing activity against a target DNA sequence. In the present invention, DNA processing activity refers to a cleavage activity, either a cleavase activity or a nickase activity. By optimal distance is intended the distance between said recognition site and I-Tevl cleavage site allowing an increase in DNA processing activity of the Tevl chimeric endonuclease. An optimal distance is considered when it provides at least a 5% increase efficiency of DNA processing activity, more preferably 10%, again more preferably 15%, again more preferably 20%, again more preferably 25%, again more preferably 50%, again more preferably greater than 50%.

In particular embodiment, nucleic acid binding recognition site is also chosen based upon its optimal spacer between the residue preceded the first nucleic acid base of nucleic acid binding recognition site and the terminal G base of the I-Tevl cleavage site. In a preferred embodiment, the optimal spacer distance is range between 1 to 50 bp, more preferably between 4 to 12 bp, again more preferably is 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 bp.

In another embodiment, said nucleic acid binding recognition site is chosen upon the residue after the terminal G base of the I-Tevl cleavage site is a nucleotide A or T.

In a particular embodiment, TALE recognition site is chosen based upon its optimal spacer distance to I-Tevl cleavage site. TALE recognition site is immediately preceded by a thymine at the 5′ end named T₀. So, TALE binding sequence is chosen based upon its optimal spacer distance between the first thymine T₀ and the terminal G base of the I-Tevl cleavage site. In a preferred embodiment, the optimal spacer distance is ranged between 0 to 50 bp, and more preferably between 6 to 12 bp. In a more preferred embodiment, the optimal spacer distance is 10 bp.

Particular embodiment, the present invention also relates to the Tevl chimeric endonuclease comprising the amino acid sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 452 to 457. In another embodiment, said Tevl chimeric endonuclease comprises a protein sequence having at least 80%, more preferably 90%, again more preferably 95% amino acid sequence identity with the protein sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 452 to SEQ ID NO: 457.

Method to Process a Target Nucleic Acid Sequence

The present invention also relates to methods for use of said Tevl chimeric endonuclease for various applications ranging from targeted nucleic acid cleavage to targeted gene regulation. In genome engineering experiments, the efficiency of chimeric endonuclease, e.g. their ability to induce a desired event (Homologous gene targeting, targeted mutagenesis, sequence removal or excision) at a locus, depends on several parameters, including the specific activity of the nuclease, probably the accessibility of the target, and the efficacy and outcome of the repair pathway(s) resulting in the desired event (homologous repair for gene targeting, NHEJ pathways for targeted mutagenesis).

A method to selectively cleave a target nucleic acid sequence by using a catalytic domain of I-Tevl is encompassed in the present invention. This method comprises selecting a target nucleic acid sequence which comprises a I-Tevl cleavage site selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO: 117, preferably SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO:55; selecting or engineering a nucleic acid binding domain to bind a recognition site adjacent to said cleavage site, fusing said nucleic acid binding domain with said catalytic domain of I-Tevl to obtain a Tevl chimeric endonuclease and contacting said target nucleic acid sequence with said Tevl chimeric endonuclease. The Tevl cleavage site may be introduced into the target nucleic acid sequence in order to be cleaved by the Tevl chimeric endonuclease. In particular, the present invention relates to a method to process a target nucleic acid sequence in a cell comprising:

-   -   a) Generating a Tevl chimeric endonuclease according to any one         of methods previously described     -   b) Introducing said Tevl chimeric endonuclease into said cell.

Depending of the I-Tevl catalytic domain position, resulting Tevl chimeric endonuclease can present different enzymatic activities. For instance, the inventors have previously showed that when I-Tevl catalytic domain is placed in natural position at the N-terminal of the DNA binding domain, chimeric endonuclease is more likely to display a cleavase activity. However, when I-Tevl catalytic domain is placed in opposite position at the C-terminal of the DNA binding domain, chimeric endonuclease is more likely to display a nickase activity. Thus, different I-Tevl conformation may be used to induce different enzymatic activities.

Any nucleic acid target sequence can be processed by the present methods. For example, the nucleic acid target sequence can be chromosomal, mitochondrial or chloroplast sequences.

The methods of the invention involve introducing Tevl chimeric endonuclease into a cell. The Tevl chimeric endonuclease may be synthesized in situ in the cell as a result of the introduction of polynucleotide encoding polypeptide into the cell. Alternatively, the chimeric endonuclease could be produced outside the cell and then introduced thereto. Methods for introducing a polynucleotide construct into bacteria, plants, fungi and animals are known in the art and including as non limiting examples stable transformation methods wherein the polynucleotide construct is integrated into the genome of the cell, transient transformation methods wherein the polynucleotide construct is not integrated into the genome of the cell and virus mediated methods. Said polynucleotides encoding MBBBD polypeptide may be introduced into a cell by for example, recombinant viral vectors (e.g. retroviruses, adenoviruses), liposomes and the like. For example, transient transformation methods include for example microinjection, electroporation or particle bombardment. Said polynucleotides encoding Tevl chimeric endonucleases may be included in vectors, more particularly plasmids or virus, in view of being expressed in prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells.

Endonucleolytic breaks are known to stimulate the rate of homologous recombination. Therefore, as another embodiment, the present invention relates to a method to induce homologous gene targeting in the target nucleic acid sequence further comprising providing to the cell an exogeneous nucleic acid comprising at least a sequence homologous to a portion of the target nucleic acid sequence, such that homologous recombination occurs between the target nucleic acid sequence and the exogeneous nucleic acid. In a preferred embodiment, said exogeneous nucleic acid comprises a first and a second portions which are homologous to region 5′ and 3′ of the target nucleic acid. Said exogeneous nucleic acid may also comprise a third portion positioned between the first and the second portion which comprise no homology with the regions 5′ and 3′ of the target nucleic acid sequence. Following cleavage of the target nucleic acid sequence, a homologous recombination event is stimulated between the genome containing the target nucleic acid sequence and the exogeneous nucleic acid.

Another aspect of the invention relates to a method to induce mutagenesis within target nucleic acid sequence. The double strand breaks caused by endonucleases are commonly repaired through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NHEJ comprises at least two different processes. Mechanisms involve rejoining of what remains of the two DNA ends through direct re-ligation (Critchlow and Jackson 1998) or via the so-called microhomology-mediated end joining (Ma, Kim et al. 2003). Repair via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) often results in small insertions or deletions and can be used for the creation of specific gene knockouts. The present invention related to a method to induce mutagenesis by using a Tevl chimeric endonuclease that allows nucleic acid cleavage that will lead to the loss of genetic information and any NHEJ pathway will produce targeted mutagenesis. In a preferred embodiment, the present invention related to a method for increasing mutagenesis at the target nucleic acid sequence to generate at least one nucleic acid cleavage and a loss of genetic information around said target nucleic acid sequence thus preventing any scarless re-ligation by NHEJ.

In a more preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to a method to process target nucleic acid sequence further comprising the step of expressing an additional catalytic domain into a host cell. It has been found that the coupling of DNA end-processing enzyme with an endonuclease ensures high frequency of targeted mutagenesis (International application WO 2012/058458). In a more preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to a method to increase mutagenesis wherein said additional catalytic domain is a DNA end-processing enzyme. Non limiting examples of DNA end-processing enzymes include 5-3′ exonucleases, 3-5′ exonucleases, 5-3′ alkaline exonucleases, 5′ flap endonucleases, helicases, hosphatase, hydrolases and template-independent DNA polymerases. Non limiting examples of such catalytic domain comprise of a protein domain or catalytically active derivate of the protein domain seleced from the group consisting of hExol (EXO1_HUMAN), Yeast Exol (EXO1_YEAST), E. coli Exol, Human TREX2, Mouse TREX1, Human TREX1, Bovine TREX1, Rat TREX1, TdT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase)(WO 2012/13717) Human DNA2 and Yeast DNA2 (DNA2_YEAST). In a preferred embodiment, said additional catalytic domain has a 3′-5′-exonuclease activity, and in a more preferred embodiment, said additional catalytic domain has TREX exonuclease activity, more preferably TREX2 activity. In another preferred embodiment, said catalytic domain is encoded by a single chain TREX2 polypeptide (International application WO2013/009525). Said additional catalytic domain can be fused to Tevl chimeric endonuclease by a peptide linker. In a more particular embodiment, the present invention relates to a Tevl chimeric endonuclease fused to a single chain TREX2 comprising the amino acid sequence: SEQ ID NO: 458. In a more preferred embodiment said Tevl chimeric endonuclease fused to single chain TREX2 comprises a protein sequence having at least 80%, more preferably 90%, again more preferably 95% amino acid sequence identity with the protein sequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 458.

Is also encompassed in the scope of the present invention related, a host cell modified by one of these methods. In another embodiment, the present invention relates to a non-human transgenic animal or a transgenic plant obtained by one of the methods.

Animals may be generated by introducing Tevl chimeric endonuclease into a cell or an embryo. In particular, the present invention relates to a method for generating an animal, comprising providing an eukaryotic cell comprising a nucleic acid target sequence into which it is desired to introduce a genetic modification; generating a cleavage within or adjacent to the nucleic acid target sequence by introducing a Tevl chimeric endonuclease according to the present invention; and generating an animal from the cell or progeny thereof, in which cleavage has occurred. Typically, the embryo is a fertilized one cell stage embryo. Polynucleotides encoding said Tevl chimeric endonuclease may be introduced into the cell by any of the methods known in the art including micro-injection into the nucleus or cytoplasm of the embryo. In a particular embodiment, the method for generating an animal, further comprise introducing an exogenous nucleic acid as desired. Said exogenous nucleic acid comprises a sequence homologous to at least a portion of the nucleic acid target sequence, such that homologous recombination occurs between said exogenous nucleic acid and the nucleic acid target sequence in the cell or progeny thereof. The exogenous nucleic acid can include for example a nucleic acid sequence that disrupts a gene after homologous recombination, a nucleic acid sequence that replaces a gene after homologous recombination, a nucleic acid sequence that introduces a mutation into a gene after homologous recombination or a nucleic acid sequence that introduces a regulatory site after homologous recombination. The embryos are then cultures to develop an animal. In one aspect of the invention, an animal in which at least a nucleic acid target sequence of interest has been engineered is provided. For example, an engineered gene may become inactivated such that it is not transcribed or properly translated, or an alternate form of the gene is expressed. The animal may be homozygous or heterozygous for the engineered gene.

The present invention also related to a method for generating a plant comprising providing a plant cell comprising a nucleic acid target sequence into which it is desired to introduce a genetic modification; generating a cleavage in the nucleic acid target sequence by introducing a Tevl chimeric endonuclease according to the present invention; and generating a plant from the cell or progeny thereof, in which cleavage has occurred. Progeny includes descendants of a particular plant or plant line. In a particular embodiment, the method for generating a plant, further comprise introducing an exogenous nucleic acid as desired. Said exogenous nucleic acid comprises a sequence homologous to at least a portion of the nucleic acid target sequence, such that homologous recombination occurs between said exogenous nucleic acid and the nucleic acid target sequence in the cell or progeny thereof. Plant cells produced using methods can be grown to generate plants having in their genome a modified nucleic acid target sequence. Seeds from such plants can be used to generate plants having a phenotype such as, for example, an altered growth characteristic, altered appearance, or altered compositions with respect to unmodified plants.

The polypeptides of the invention are useful to engineer genomes and to reprogram cells, especially iPS cells and ES cells.

The present invention also relates to kits used to implement the method according to the present invention. More preferably, is encompassed in the scope of the present invention, a kit comprising a Tevl chimeric endonuclease and instructions for use said kit in processing target nucleic acid.

It is understood that, Tevl chimeric endonuclease, nucleic acid binding domains, RVDs, TALE, protein domains and polypeptides according to the present invention can also comprise single or plural additional amino acid substitutions or amino acid insertion or amino acid deletion introduced by mutagenesis process well known in the art. Are also encompassed in the scope of the present invention variants, functional mutants and derivatives from Tevl chimeric endonuclease, DNA binding domains, RVDs, TALE, protein domain and polypeptides according to the present invention. Are also encompassed in the scope of the present invention Tevl chimeric endonuclease, DNA binding domains, RVDs, TALE, protein domain and polypeptides which present a sequence with high percentage of identity or high percentage of homology with sequences of Tevl chimeric endonuclease, DNA binding domains, RVDs, TALE, protein domains and polypeptides according to the present invention, at nucleotidic or polypeptidic levels. By high percentage of identity or high percentage of homology it is intended 70%, more preferably 75%, more preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more preferably 95, more preferably 97%, more preferably 99% or any integer comprised between 70% and 99%.

DEFINITIONS

-   -   Amino acid residues in a polypeptide sequence are designated         herein according to the one-letter code, in which, for example,         Q means Gln or Glutamine residue, R means Arg or Arginine         residue and D means Asp or Aspartic acid residue.     -   Amino acid substitution means the replacement of one amino acid         residue with another, for instance the replacement of an         Arginine residue with a Glutamine residue in a peptide sequence         is an amino acid substitution.     -   Nucleotides are designated as follows: one-letter code is used         for designating the base of a nucleoside: a is adenine, t is         thymine, c is cytosine, and g is guanine. For the degenerated         nucleotides, r represents g or a (purine nucleotides), k         represents g or t, s represents g or c, w represents a or t, m         represents a or c, y represents t or c (pyrimidine nucleotides),         d represents g, a or t, v represents g, a or c, b represents g,         t or c, h represents a, t or c, and n represents g, a, t or c.     -   By “delivery vector” or “delivery vectors” is intended any         delivery vector which can be used in the present invention to         put into cell contact (i.e “contacting”) or deliver inside cells         or subcellular compartments agents/chemicals and molecules         (proteins or nucleic acids) needed in the present invention. It         includes, but is not limited to liposomal delivery vectors,         viral delivery vectors, drug delivery vectors, chemical         carriers, polymeric carriers, lipoplexes, polyplexes,         dendrimers, microbubbles (ultrasound contrast agents),         nanoparticles, emulsions or other appropriate transfer vectors.         These delivery vectors allow delivery of molecules, chemicals,         macromolecules (genes, proteins), or other vectors such as         plasmids, peptides developed by Diatos. In these cases, delivery         vectors are molecule carriers. By “delivery vector” or “delivery         vectors” is also intended delivery methods to perform         transfection.     -   The terms “vector” or “vectors” refer to a nucleic acid molecule         capable of transporting another nucleic acid to which it has         been linked. A “vector” in the present invention includes, but         is not limited to, a viral vector, a plasmid, a RNA vector or a         linear or circular DNA or RNA molecule which may consists of a         chromosomal, non chromosomal, semi-synthetic or synthetic         nucleic acids. Preferred vectors are those capable of autonomous         replication (episomal vector) and/or expression of nucleic acids         to which they are linked (expression vectors). Large numbers of         suitable vectors are known to those of skill in the art and         commercially available.

Viral vectors include retrovirus, adenovirus, parvovirus (e.g. adenoassociated viruses), coronavirus, negative strand RNA viruses such as orthomyxovirus (e.g., influenza virus), rhabdovirus (e.g., rabies and vesicular stomatitis virus), paramyxovirus (e.g. measles and Sendai), positive strand RNA viruses such as picornavirus and alphavirus, and double-stranded DNA viruses including adenovirus, herpesvirus (e.g., Herpes Simplex virus types 1 and 2, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus), and poxvirus (e.g., vaccinia, fowlpox and canarypox). Other viruses include Norwalk virus, togavirus, flavivirus, reoviruses, papovavirus, hepadnavirus, and hepatitis virus, for example. Examples of retroviruses include: avian leukosis-sarcoma, mammalian C-type, B-type viruses, D type viruses, HTLV-BLV group, lentivirus, spumavirus (Coffin, J. M., Retroviridae: The viruses and their replication, In Fundamental Virology, Third Edition, B. N. Fields, et al., Eds., Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1996).

-   -   By cell or cells is intended any prokaryotic or eukaryotic         living cells, cell lines derived from these organisms for in         vitro cultures, primary cells from animal or plant origin.     -   By “primary cell” or “primary cells” are intended cells taken         directly from living tissue (i.e. biopsy material) and         established for growth in vitro, that have undergone very few         population doublings and are therefore more representative of         the main functional components and characteristics of tissues         from which they are derived from, in comparison to continuous         tumorigenic or artificially immortalized cell lines. These cells         thus represent a more valuable model to the in vivo state they         refer to.     -   In the frame of the present invention, “eukaryotic cells” refer         to a fungal, plant or animal cell or a cell line derived from         the organisms listed below and established for in vitro culture.         More preferably, the fungus is of the genus Aspergillus,         Penicillium, Acremonium, Trichoderma, Chrysoporium, Mortierella,         Kluyveromyces or Pichia; More preferably, the fungus is of the         species Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus         oryzae, Aspergillus terreus, Penicillium chrysogenum,         Penicillium citrinum, Acremonium Chrysogenum, Trichoderma         reesei, Mortierella alpine, Chrysosporium lucknowense,         Kluyveromyces lactis, Pichia pastoris or Pichia ciferrii.

More preferably the plant is of the genus Arabidospis, Nicotiana, Solanum, lactuca, Brassica, Oryza, Asparagus, Pisum, Medicago, Zea, Hordeum, Secale, Triticum, Capsicum, Cucumis, Cucurbita, Citrullis, Citrus, Sorghum; More preferably, the plant is of the species Arabidospis thaliana, Nicotiana tabaccum, Solanum lycopersicum, Solanum tuberosum, Solanum melongena, Solanum esculentum, Lactuca saliva, Brassica napus, Brassica oleracea, Brassica rapa, Oryza glaberrima, Oryza sativa, Asparagus officinalis, Pisum sativum, Medicago sativa, zea mays, Hordeum vulgare, Secale cereal, Triticum aestivum, Triticum durum, Capsicum sativus, Cucurbita pepo, Citrullus lanatus, Cucumis melo, Citrus aurantifolia, Citrus maxima, Citrus medica, Citrus reticulata.

More preferably the animal cell is of the genus Homo, Rattus, Mus, Sus, Bos, Danio, Canis, Felis, Equus, Salmo, Oncorhynchus, Gallus, Meleagris, Drosophila, Caenorhabditis; more preferably, the animal cell is of the species Homo sapiens, Rattus norvegicus, Mus musculus, Sus scrofa, Bos taurus, Danio rerio, Canis lupus, Felis catus, Equus caballus, Salmo salar, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Gallus gallus, Meleagris gallopavo, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans.

In the present invention, the cell can be a plant cell, a mammalian cell, a fish cell, an insect cell or cell lines derived from these organisms for in vitro cultures or primary cells taken directly from living tissue and established for in vitro culture. As non-limiting examples, cell can be protoplasts obtained from plant organisms listed above. As non limiting examples cell lines can be selected from the group consisting of CHO-K1 cells; HEK293 cells; Caco2 cells; U2-OS cells; NIH 3T3 cells; NSO cells; SP2 cells; CHO-S cells; DG44 cells; K-562 cells, U-937 cells; MRC5 cells; IMR90 cells; Jurkat cells; HepG2 cells; HeLa cells; HT-1080 cells; HCT-116 cells; Hu-h7 cells; Huvec cells; Molt 4 cells.

-   -   by “homologous” is intended a sequence with enough identity to         another one to lead to homologous recombination between         sequences, more particularly having at least 95% identity,         preferably 97% identity and more preferably 99%.     -   “identity” refers to sequence identity between two nucleic acid         molecules or polypeptides. Identity can be determined by         comparing a position in each sequence which may be aligned for         purposes of comparison. When a position in the compared sequence         is occupied by the same base, then the molecules are identical         at that position. A degree of similarity or identity between         nucleic acid or amino acid sequences is a function of the number         of identical or matching nucleotides at positions shared by the         nucleic acid sequences. Various alignment algorithms and/or         programs may be used to calculate the identity between two         sequences, including FASTA, or BLAST which are available as a         part of the GCG sequence analysis package (University of         Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.), and can be used with, e.g., default         setting.     -   by “mutation” is intended the substitution, deletion, insertion         of one or more nucleotides/amino acids in a polynucleotide         (cDNA, gene) or a polypeptide sequence. Said mutation can affect         the coding sequence of a gene or its regulatory sequence. It may         also affect the structure of the genomic sequence or the         structure/stability of the encoded mRNA.     -   By “gene” is meant the basic unit of heredity, consisting of a         segment of DNA arranged in a linear manner along a chromosome,         which codes for a specific protein or segment of protein. A gene         typically includes a promoter, a 5′ untranslated region, one or         more coding sequences (exons), optionally introns, a 3′         untranslated region. The gene may further comprise a terminator,         enhancers and/or silencers.     -   As used herein, the term “transgene” refers to a sequence         encoding a polypeptide. Preferably, the polypeptide encoded by         the transgene is either not expressed or expressed but not         biologically active, in the cell, tissue or individual in which         the transgene is inserted. Most preferably, the transgene         encodes a therapeutic polypeptide useful for the treatment of an         individual.     -   Nucleic acid processing activity refers to a particular/given         enzymatic activity of said Tevl chimeric endonuclease. Said         nucleic acid processing activity can refer to a cleavage         activity, either a cleavase activity either a nickase activity,         more broadly a nuclease activity but also a polymerase activity,         a kinase activity, a phosphatase activity, a methylase activity,         a topoisomerase activity, an integrase activity, a transposase         activity or a ligase activity as non-limiting examples. In the         scope of this definition, said given nucleic acid processing         activity of a particular enzymatic activity can also be         described as nucleic acid processing efficiency of said         particular enzymatic activity.     -   Efficiency of Tevl chimeric endonuclease according to the         present invention is the property for said Tevl chimeric         endonuclease of producing a desired event. This desired event         can be for example Homologous gene targeting, targeted         mutagenesis, or sequence removal or excision. The efficiency of         the desired event depends on several parameters, including the         specific activity of the nuclease and the repair pathway(s)         resulting in the desired event (efficacy of homologous repair         for gene targeting, efficacy and outcome of NHEJ pathways for         targeted mutagenesis). Efficiency of a rare cutting endonuclease         for a locus is intended to mean its ability to produce a desired         event at this locus. Efficiency of a rare cutting endonuclease         for a target is intended to mean its ability to produce a         desired event as a consequence of cleavage of this target.     -   By “exogeneous” it is intended nucleic acid or protein sequence         not naturally associated with a target gene or a host cell into         which it is introduced, including non-naturally occurring         multiple copies of a naturally occurring nucleic acid e.g., DNA         sequence, or naturally occurring nucleic acid sequence located         in on-naturally occurring genome location.     -   by “peptide linker”, it is intended to mean a peptide sequence         which allows the connection of different monomers in a fusion         protein and the adoption of the correct conformation for said         fusion protein activity and which does not alter the specificity         of either of the monomers for their targets. Peptide linkers can         be of various sizes, from 3 amino acids to 50 amino acids as a         non limiting indicative range. Peptide linkers can also be         structured or unstructured.     -   by “Tevl chimeric endonuclease variant”, “I-Tevl catalytic         domain variant”, it is intended an Tevl chimeric endonuclease or         “I-Tevl catalytic domain”, obtained by replacement of at least         one residue in the amino acid sequence of the parent Tevl         chimeric endonuclease, with at least a different amino acid.         “Variant” designation also applies for instance for Tevl         chimeric endonuclease comprising at least one supplementary         protein domain (additional catalytic domain) in comparison to         the starting Tevl chimeric endonuclease. Are also encompassed in         the scope of the present definition, variants and protein         domains comprised in these variants which present a sequence         with high percentage of identity or high percentage of homology         with sequences of protein domains and polypeptides according to         the present invention, at nucleotidic or polypeptidic levels. By         high percentage of identity or high percentage of homology it is         intended 60%, more preferably 70%, more preferably 75%, more         preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, more preferably 90%, more         preferably 95, more preferably 97%, more preferably 99% or any         integer comprised between 60% and 99%.     -   The term “endonuclease” refers to any wild-type or variant         enzyme capable of catalyzing the hydrolysis (cleavage) of bonds         between nucleic acids within a DNA or RNA molecule, preferably a         DNA molecule. Endonucleases can be classified as rare-cutting         endonucleases when having typically a polynucleotide recognition         greater than 12 base pairs (bp) in length, more preferably of         14-45 bp. Rare-cutting endonucleases significantly increase HR         by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at a defined locus         (Rouet, Smih et al. 1994; Rouet, Smih et al. 1994; Choulika,         Perrin et al. 1995; Pingoud and Silva 2007). Rare-cutting         endonucleases can for example be a homing endonuclease (Paques         and Duchateau 2007), a chimeric Zinc-Finger nuclease (ZFN)         resulting from the fusion of engineered zinc-finger domains with         the catalytic domain of a restriction enzyme such as Fokl         (Porteus and Carroll 2005) or a chemical endonuclease         (Eisenschmidt, Lanio et al. 2005; Arimondo, Thomas et al. 2006;         Simon, Cannata et al. 2008). In chemical endonucleases, a         chemical or peptidic cleaver is conjugated either to a polymer         of nucleic acids or to another DNA recognizing a specific target         sequence, thereby targeting the cleavage activity to a specific         sequence. Chemical endonucleases also encompass synthetic         nucleases like conjugates of orthophenanthroline, a DNA cleaving         molecule, and triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs), known to         bind specific DNA sequences (Kalish and Glazer 2005). Such         chemical endonucleases are comprised in the term “endonuclease”         according to the present invention.     -   Transcription Activator Like Effector (TALE) is a family of         proteins used in the infection process by plant pathogens of the         Xanthomonas genus (Boch, Scholze et al. 2009; Moscou and         Bogdanove 2009; Christian, Cermak et al. 2010; Li, Huang et al.         2011; Li, Huang et al. 2011).     -   By “fusion protein” is intended the result of a well-known         process in the art consisting in the joining of two or more         genes which originally encode for separate proteins or part of         them, the translation of said “fusion gene” resulting in a         single polypeptide with functional properties derived from each         of the original proteins.     -   By “catalytic domain” is intended the protein domain or module         of an enzyme containing the active site of said enzyme; by         active site is intended the part of said enzyme at which         catalysis of the substrate occurs. Enzymes, but also their         catalytic domains, are classified and named according to the         reaction they catalyze. The Enzyme Commission number (EC number)         is a numerical classification scheme for enzymes, based on the         chemical reactions they catalyze         (http://www.chem.qmuLac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/).     -   By “nuclease catalytic domain” is intended the protein domain         comprising the active site of an endonuclease or an exonuclease         enzyme. Such nuclease catalytic domain can be, for instance, a         “cleavase domain” or a “nickase domain”. By “cleavase domain” is         intended a protein domain whose catalytic activity generates a         Double Strand Break (DSB) in a nucleic acid target. By “nickase         domain” is intended a protein domain whose catalytic activity         generates a single strand break in a nucleic acid target         sequence.     -   In the frame of the present invention, the expression         “double-strand break-induced mutagenesis” (DSB-induced         mutagenesis) refers to a mutagenesis event consecutive to an         NHEJ event following an endonuclease-induced DSB, leading to         insertion/deletion at the cleavage site of an endonuclease.     -   By the expression “loss of genetic information” is understood         the elimination or addition of at least one given nucleic acid         fragment (at least one nucleotide) or sequence, bordering the         recognition sites of the Tevl chimeric endonuclease of the         present invention or the intervening sequence between at least         two processing sites of the Tevl chimeric endonuclease of the         present invention and leading to a change of the original         sequence around said Tevl chimeric endonuclease cleavage sites,         within the genomic locus of interest.     -   By “scarless re-ligation” or “scarless religation” is intended         the perfect re-ligation event, without loss of genetic         information (no insertion/deletion events) of the DNA broken         ends through NHEJ process after the creation of a double-strand         break event.     -   By “Imprecise NHEJ” is intended the re-ligation of nucleic acid         ends generated by a DSB, with insertions or deletions of         nucleotides. Imprecise NHEJ is an outcome and not a repair         pathway and can result from different NHEJ pathways (Ku         dependent or Ku independent as non-limiting examples).

The above written description of the invention provides a manner and process of making and using it such that any person skilled in this art is enabled to make and use the same, this enablement being provided in particular for the subject matter of the appended claims, which make up a part of the original description.

As used above, the phrases “selected from the group consisting of,” “chosen from,” and the like include mixtures of the specified materials.

Where a numerical limit or range is stated herein, the endpoints are included. Also, all values and subranges within a numerical limit or range are specifically included as if explicitly written out.

The above description is presented to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, this invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.

Having generally described this invention, a further understanding can be obtained by reference to certain specific examples, which are provided herein for purposes of illustration only, and are not intended to be limiting unless otherwise specified.

EXAMPLES

Different variants of I-Tevl catalytic domain, a member of the GIY-YIG endonuclease family (Mueller, Smith et al. 1995), was fused to the N-terminal part of a TAL backbone or BurrH-36 backbone derived from EAV36 BURRH protein to create a new class of TALEN (Tevl::TALE) or MBBBD nuclease (Tevl::BurrH_(—)36). The construct names are written as CD::TALE-DBA or CD::Burrh_(—)36-DBA (catalytic domain is fused N-terminal to the TALE domain or the MBBBD) where “-DBA” (DNA binding array) optionally designates the sequence recognized by the TALE or MBBBD and “CD” is the catalytic domain type.

I-Tevl protein is a tripartite protein, composed of a C-terminal domain responsible for binding specificity, linked to N-terminal catalytic domain by a long flexible linker. The N-terminal catalytic domain contributes to specificity via nucleic acid cleavage selectivity, characterized biochemically and defined by the degenerate CNNNG motif (with CAACGC as the natural cleavage sequence). Herein we describe a novel pattern of specificity for I-Tevl cleavage in the context of Tevl::TALE and Tevl::Burrh_(—)36 constructs.

Example 1 Construction of Different Tevl Chimeric Endonucleases

Construction of TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3

A variant of the I-Tevl catalytic domain named TevD02 (SEQ ID NO: 268) consisting of the N-terminal 183 residues of the wild-type catalytic domain of I-Tevl (SEQ ID NO: 257) was amplified by the PCR on template TevCreD02 (SEQ ID NO: 269 protein in plasmid pCLS6615 (SEQ ID NO: 270)) using the primer pair CMP_G001 (SEQ ID NO: 271) and CMP_G068 (SEQ ID NO: 272).

The sT2 (SEQ ID NO: 259) core TALE scaffold was selected to generate pCLS7865-cTAL11_NFS1 (pCLS9008, SEQ ID NO: 273), where NFS1 designates the amino acid sequence -GSSG- (with underlying restriction sites BamH1 and Kpn2I in the coding DNA to facilitate cloning).

TevD02 was subcloned into the pCLS9008 backbone by restriction and ligation using NcoI and Kpn2I restriction sites, yielding pCLS7865-TevD02::cT11 (pCLS12730, SEQ ID NO: 274).

The fusion contains the sequence-QGPSG- linking the TALE-derived DNA binding domain and I-Tevl derived catalytic domain.

The DNA sequence coding for the DNA binding array to target the AvrBs3 site (SEQ ID NO: 275) was subcloned into plasmid pCLS12730 (SEQ ID NO: 274) using Type IIS restriction enzymes BsmBI for the receiving plasmid and BbvI and SfaNI for the inserted RVD sequence to create the subsequent TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3 construct (pCLS12731, SEQ ID NO: 276). The TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3 construct was sequenced and the insert transferred to additional vectors as needed (see below).

The final TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3 yeast expression plasmid pCLS8522 (SEQ ID NO: 277) encoding TevD02-TALE chimeric endonuclease (SEQ ID NO: 279) was prepared by yeast in vivo cloning using plasmid pCLS12731. To generate an intact coding sequence by in vivo homologous recombination, approximately 40 ng of pCLS12731 plasmid linearized by digestion with BssHII and 1 ng of the pCLS0542 (SEQ ID NO: 278) plasmid linearized by digestion with NcoI and EagI were used to transform the yeast S. cerevisiae strain FYC2-6A (MATa, trp1Δ63, leu2Δ1, his3Δ200) using a high efficiency LiAc transformation protocol (Arnould, Perez et al. 2007).

Construction of TevD02::b36-AvrBs3

The BurrH_(—)36 core scaffold (SEQ ID NO: 280) derived from EAV36 BURRH protein was composed of a N-terminal domain and a C-terminal domain separated by a small DNA sequence containing two BsmBI sites allowing further cloning of the DNA coding for the DNA binding array. Short sequences were added between the different pieces for cloning purpose or to create linkers at the protein level. The BurrH_(—)36 scaffold was then cloned into vector pCLS7865 (SEQ ID NO: 281) to generate pCLS7865-BurrH_(—)36.

TevD02 (SEQ ID NO: 268) was fused to the N-terminal part of the BurrH_(—)36 scaffold into the pCLS7865-BurrH_(—)36 by restriction and ligation using standard biological tools, yielding pCLS7865-TevD002::b36. The fusion contains the sequence-QGPSG- linking the BurrH_(—)36-derived DNA binding domain and I-Tevl-derived catalytic domain.

The DNA sequence coding for the DNA binding array to target the AvrBs3 site (SEQ ID NO: 282) was subcloned into plasmid pCLS7865-TevD02::b36 using Type IIS restriction enzymes BsmBI for the receiving plasmid and for the inserted DNA binding array sequence to create the subsequent TevD02::b36-AvrBs3 construct. The TevD02::b36-AvrBs3 construct was sequenced and the insert transferred to additional vectors as needed (see below).

The final TevD02::b36-AvrBs3 yeast expression plasmid encoding TevD02-BurrH chimeric endonuclease (SEQ ID NO: 283) was prepared by yeast in vivo cloning using TevD02::b36-AvrBs3 construct. To generate an intact coding sequence by in vivo homologous recombination, approximately 40 ng of TevD02::b36-AvrBs3 plasmid linearized and 1 ng of the pCLS0542 (SEQ ID NO: 278) plasmid linearized were used to transform the yeast S. cerevisiae strain FYC2-6A (MATα, trp1Δ63, leu2Δ1, his3Δ200) using a high efficiency LiAc transformation protocol (Arnould, Perez et al. 2007).

Construction of TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3

Another variant of the I-Tevl catalytic domain named TevM01 (SEQ ID NO: 284) consisting of the N-terminal 137 residues of the wild-type I-Tevl (SEQ ID NO: 257) was amplified by the PCR on template TevCreD02 [SEQ ID NO: 269 protein in plasmid pCLS6615 (SEQ ID NO: 270]. The sT2 (SEQ ID NO: 259) core TALE scaffold was selected to generate pCLS7865-cTAL11_NFS1 (pCLS9008, SEQ ID NO: 273), where NFS1 designates the amino acid sequence -GSSG- (with underlying restriction sites BamHI and Kpn2I in the coding DNA to facilitate cloning).

TevM01 was subcloned into the pCLS9008 backbone, yielding pCLS7865-TevM01::cT11. The fusion contains the sequence -SG- linking the TALE-derived DNA binding domain and I-Tevl-derived catalytic domain.

The DNA sequence coding for the DNA binding array to target the AvrBs3 site (SEQ ID NO: 275) was subcloned into pCLS7865-TevM01::cT11 plasmid to create the subsequent TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 constructs. The TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 construct was sequenced and the insert transferred to additional vectors as needed (see below).

The final TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 yeast expression plasmid encoding TevM01-TALE chimeric endonuclease (SEQ ID NO: 285) was prepared by yeast in vivo cloning using TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 construct. To generate an intact coding sequence by in vivo homologous recombination, approximately 40 ng of TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 construct linearized and 1 ng of the pCLS0542 (SEQ ID NO: 278) plasmid linearized were used to transform the yeast S. cerevisiae strain FYC2-6A (MATα, trp1Δ63, leu211, his3Δ200) using a high efficiency LiAc transformation protocol (Arnould, Perez et al. 2007).

Construction of TevM01::b36-AvrBs3

TevM01 was fused to the N-terminal part of the Burrh_(—)36 scaffold into the pCLS7865-Burrh_(—)36 by restriction and ligation using standard biological tools, yielding pCLS7865-TevM01::b36. The fusion contains the dipeptide-IA- linking the BurrH_(—)36-derived DNA binding domain and I-Tevl-derived catalytic domain.

The DNA sequence coding for the DNA binding array to target the AvrBs3 site (SEQ ID NO: 282) was subcloned into plasmid pCLS7865-TevM01::b36 to create the subsequent TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 construct. The TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 construct was sequenced and the insert transferred to additional vectors as needed (see below).

The final TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 yeast expression plasmid encoding TevM01-BurrH-AvrBs3 chimeric endonuclease (SEQ ID NO: 286) was prepared by yeast in vivo cloning using plasmid pCLS12731. To generate an intact coding sequence by in vivo homologous recombination, approximately 40 ng of TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 construct linearized and 1 ng of the pCLS0542 (SEQ ID NO: 278) plasmid linearized were used to transform the yeast S. cerevisiae strain FYC2-6A (MATα, trp1Δ63, leu211, his3Δ200) using a high efficiency LiAc transformation protocol (Arnould, Perez et al. 2007).

Example 2 Distance Requirement for Tevl::TALE Cleavage in an In Vivo Yeast Assay

All the yeast target reporter plasmids containing the TALE nucleic acid target sequences were constructed as previously described (International PCT Applications WO 2004/067736 and in (Epinat, Arnould et al. 2003; Chames, Epinat et al. 2005; Arnould, Chames et al. 2006; Smith, Grizot et al. 2006)).

As the natural I-Tevl linker can act as a distance determinant for nucleic acid cleavage by the catalytic domain, we asked whether a similar relationship exists in the context of a TALE fusion. The TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3 construct was tested in a yeast SSA assay as previously described (International PCT Applications WO 2004/067736 and in (Epinat, Arnould et al. 2003; Chames, Epinat et al. 2005; Arnould, Chames et al. 2006; Smith, Grizot et al. 2006)) on targets containing a single AvrBs3 recognition site and the I-Tevl cleavage sequence CAACGC (SEQ ID NO:1) spaced from 0 to 50 bps away from the T0 of the AvrBS3 TALE binding site, with spacing reported as the distance between the G base of the cleavage sequence and the T0 (SEQ ID NO: 288 to 342, Table 1). The TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3 activity levels on single AvrBs3 site targets in yeast cells are shown in table 2. TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3 construct presents an optimal activity for a spacing of 10 bp between the cleavage sequence and the T0 of the TALE binding site.

TABLE 1 List of nucleic acid target sequences containing a DNA binding domain site and an I-TevI cleavage site spaced from 0 to 50 bp. The target numbers correspond to the distance between the G of the I-TevI cleavage sequence CAACGC (SEQ ID NO: 1) (uppercase bold) and the T0 of the TALE DNA binding site (uppercase). The “a” targets correspond to duplicate targets where a cryptic CNNNG I-TevI cleavage site (underlined) has been removed. SEQ Spacer Nucleic acid Target Sequence ID 01 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaatCAACGCTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 288 02 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaaCAACGCtTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 289 03 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaCAACGCatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 290 04 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactCAACGCaatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 291 05 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatacCAACGCatatTATATAAACCTAACCCICT 292 06 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgataCAACGCatgatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 293 07 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatCAACGCatgcatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 294 08 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgaCAACGCatgctatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 295 09 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgCAACGCatgcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 296 10 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacCAACGCatgccgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCICT 297 11 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttaCAACGCatgctcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 298 12 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttCAACGCatgcttcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 299 12a actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttCAACGCatgcttcAtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 300 13 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtactCAACGCatgcattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 301 14 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacCAACGCatgcaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 302 15 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtaCAACGCatgctaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 303 16 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtCAACGCatgcctaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 304 17 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactgCAACGCatgcactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 305 18 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctactCAACGCatgctactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 306 19 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctacCAACGCatgcatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 307 20 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagctCAACGCatgccgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 308 21 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagcCAACGCatgcacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 309 21a actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagCAACGCatgctacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 310 22 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaagCAACGCatgctacAatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 311 23 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaaCAACGCatgcttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 312 24 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacaCAACGCatgccttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 313 25 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatacCAACGCatgcacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 314 26 actagatcaatcagtcatctaataCAACGCatgctacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 315 27 actagatcaatcagtcatctaatCAACGCatgcgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 316 28 actagatcaatcagtcatctaaCAACGCatgctgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 317 29 actagatcaatcagtcatctaCAACGCatgcctgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 318 29a actagatcaatcagtcatctCAACGCatgcactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 319 30 actagatcaatcagtcatctCAACGCatgcactAtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 320 31 actagatcaatcagtcatcCAACGCatgctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 321 32 actagatcaatcagtcatCAACGCatgcgtactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 322 33 actagatcaatcagtcaCAACGCatgcgctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 323 34 actagatcaatcagtcCAACGCatgcagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 324 35 actagatcaatcagtCAACGCatgcaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 325 36 actagatcaatcagCAACGCatgccaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 326 37 actagatcaatcagCAACGCatgccaaActactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 327 38 actagatcaatcaCAACGCatgcacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 328 39 actagatcaatcCAACGCatgctacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 329 40 ActagatcaatCAACGCatgcatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 330 41 actagatcaaCAACGCatgcaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 331 42 actagatcaCAACGCatgctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 332 43 actagatcCAACGCatgcctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 333 44 actagatCAACGCatgctctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 334 45 actagaCAACGCatgcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 335 46 actagCAACGCatgccatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 336 47 actaCAACGCatgctcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 337 48 actCAACGCatgcgtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 338 49 acCAACGCatgcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 339 50 aCAACGCatgccagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 340 51 CAACGCatgctcagtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 341 51a CAACGCatgctcaAtcatctaatacaagctactgtacttacgatactaattcgtatTATATAAACCTAACCCTCT 342

TABLE 2 Activity of Tevl chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on targets containing a single AvrBs3 recognition site and the I-Tevl cleavage sequence CAACGC spaced from 0 to 50 by away from the T0. The TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3 construct was tested in a yeast SSA assay as previously described (International PCT Applications WO 2004/067736 and in (Epinat, Arnould et al. 2003; Chames, Epinat et al. 2005; Arnould, Chames et al. 2006; Smith, Grizot et al. 2006)) on targets containing a single AvrBs3 recognition site and the terminal G base of the I-Tevl cleavage sequence CAACGC (SEQ ID NO: 1) spaced from 0 to 50 bps listed in table 1. Neg. TevD02::cT11- Spacer Control AvrBs3 Spacer-01 n.d. n.d. Spacer-02 n.d. n.d. Spacer-03 n.d. n.d. Spacer-04 n.d. n.d. Spacer-05 n.d. + Spacer-06 n.d. ++ Spacer-07 n.d. ++ Spacer-08 n.d. ++ Spacer-09 n.d. ++ Spacer-10 n.d. +++ Spacer-11 n.d. ++ Spacer-12 n.d. ++ Spacer-12a n.d. ++ Spacer-13 n.d. + Spacer-14 n.d. n.d. Spacer-15 n.d. n.d. Spacer-16 n.d. n.d. Spacer-17 n.d. n.d. Spacer-18 n.d. n.d. Spacer-19 n.d. n.d. Spacer-20 n.d. n.d. Spacer-21 n.d. n.d. Spacer-21a n.d. n.d. Spacer-22 n.d. n.d. Spacer-23 n.d. n.d. Spacer-24 n.d. n.d. Spacer-25 n.d. n.d. Spacer-26 n.d. n.d. Spacer-27 n.d. n.d. Spacer-28 n.d. n.d. Spacer-29 n.d. n.d. Spacer-29a n.d. n.d. Spacer-30 n.d. n.d. Spacer-31 n.d. n.d. Spacer-32 n.d. n.d. Spacer-33 n.d. n.d. Spacer-34 n.d. n.d. Spacer-35 n.d. n.d. Spacer-36 n.d. n.d. Spacer-37 n.d. n.d. Spacer-38 n.d. n.d. Spacer-39 n.d. n.d. Spacer-40 n.d. n.d. Spacer-41 n.d. n.d. Spacer-42 n.d. n.d. Spacer-43 n.d. n.d. Spacer-44 n.d. n.d. Spacer-45 n.d. n.d. Spacer-46 n.d. n.d. Spacer-47 n.d. n.d. Spacer-48 n.d. n.d. Spacer-49 n.d. n.d. Spacer-50 n.d. n.d. Spacer-51 n.d. n.d. Spacer-51a n.d. n.d.

Example 3 Target Sequence Specificity for Tevl::TALE and Tevl::BurrH_(—)36 Cleavage Example 3a Sequence Specificity for Tevl::TALE and Tevl::BurrH 36 Cleavage in an In Vivo Yeast Assay

In order to address whether all CNNNG motifs were equivalently cut by I-Tevl in the context of a TALE or BurrH_(—)36 fusion, we tested TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3, TevD02::b36-AvrBs3, TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 and TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 cleavage activity on a series of targets (TG10RGAr_CNNGN) containing a CNNNGN motif (with N=A, C, G or T) (SEQ ID NO:2 to SEQ ID NO:256) spaced at the optimal distance of 10 bp from the T0 of a single AvrBs3 recognition site (SEQ ID NO: 287) (CNNNGN-10N-AvrBs3 recognition site; with N=A, C, G or T) (SEQ ID NO: 343). The results show that variations in the CNNNGN motif modulate TevD02::TALE-AvrBs3, TevD02::BurrH_(—)36-AvrBs3, TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 and TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 activities. TevD02::TALE-AvrBs3, TevD02::BurrH_(—)36-AvrBs3, TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 and TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 activity levels on their respective targets in yeast cells are shown respectively in Tables 3 to 5.

TABLE 3 High activity of TevI chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on a series of I-TevI cleavage sites. Activity of TevD02::cT11- AvrBs3, TevD02::b36-AvrBs3, TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 and TevM01::b36- AvrBs3 on a series of targets (TG10RGAr_CNNGN; SEQ ID NO: 343) containing a CNNNGN motif (SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO: 55). The negative control consists in a TALE scaffold without any DNA binding domain. n.d. indicates no detectable activity, +++ in- dicates an activity over 0.7 and ++ indicates an activity be- tween 0.5 and 0.7 in our assay (International PCT Applications WO 2004/067736 and in Epinat, Arnould et al. 2003; Chames, Epinat et al. 2005; Arnould, Chames et al. 2006; Smith, Grizot et al. 2006). I-TevI cleavage SEQ Neg. TevD02::cT11- TevD02::b36- TevM01::cT11- TevM01::b36- site ID Control AvrBs3 AvrBs3 AvrBs3 AvrBs3 CAAAGG  2 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CAACGG  3 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CAATGG  4 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CACAGG  5 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CACCGG  6 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CAGAGG  7 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CAGCGC  8 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CAGCGG  9 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CAGTGG 10 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CATAGC 11 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CATAGG 12 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CATCGG 13 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CATGGG 14 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CATTGG 15 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CCACGG 16 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CGACGG 17 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CTACGG 18 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CTATGG 19 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CTGAGG 20 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CTGCGG 21 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CTTAGG 22 n.d. +++ +++ +++ +++ CAACGT 23 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CAAGGG 24 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CAATGC 25 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CAATGT 26 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CACTGG 27 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CAGAGC 28 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CAGCGA 29 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CAGGGG 30 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CAGTGT 31 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CATAGA 32 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CATAGT 33 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CATCGC 34 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CATTGC 35 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CCAAGG 36 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CCATGG 37 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CCGCGG 38 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CCTAGG 39 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CCTCGG 40 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CGAAGG 41 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CGATGG 42 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTAAGG 43 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTACGA 44 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTACGC 45 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTACGT 46 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTATGC 47 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTCAGG 48 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTGTGG 49 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTTCGG 50 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTTTGG 51 n.d. +++ ++ +++ +++ CTGCGC 52 n.d. ++ ++ +++ +++ CAGTGC 53 n.d. ++ ++ ++ +++ CGTAGG 54 n.d. +++ ++ ++ +++ CACGGG 55 n.d. +++ ++ ++ +++

TABLE 4 Medium activity of TevI chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on a series of I-TevI cleavage sites. Activity of TevD02::cT11- AvrBs3, TevD02::b36-AvrBs3, TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 and TevM01::b36- AvrBs3 on a series of targets (TG10RGAr_CNNGN; SEQ ID NO: 343) containing a CNNNGN motif (SEQ ID NO: 56 to SEQ ID NO: 117). The negative control consists in a TALE scaffold without any DNA binding domain. n.d. indicates no detectable activity, +++ in- dicates an activity over 0.7 and ++ indicates an activity between 0.5 and 0.7 , + indicates an activity between 03 and 0.5 in our assay (International PCT Applications WO 2004/067736 and in Epinat, Arnould et al. 2003; Chames, Epinat et al. 2005; Arnould, Chames et al. 2006; Smith, Grizot et al. 2006). I-TevI SEQ cleavage ID Neg. TevD02::cT11- TevD02::b36- TevM01::cT11- TevM01::b36- site NO Control AvrBs3 AvrBs3 AvrBs3 AvrBs3 CAATGA  56 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CAGAGT  57 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CATTGA  58 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CATTGT  59 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CCACGT  60 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CCGAGG  61 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CCGTGG  62 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CCTTGG  63 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CGACGC  64 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CGTCGG  65 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CTATGT  66 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CTCCGG  67 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CTTCGC  68 n.d. +++ + +++ +++ CAAAGC  69 n.d. +++ + ++ +++ CATGGC  70 n.d. +++ + ++ +++ CACCGT  71 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CAGCGT  72 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CAGTGA  73 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CCACGC  74 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CGGAGG  75 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CGTTGG  76 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CTCTGG  77 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CTGTGT  78 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CTTCGT  79 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CTTGGG  80 n.d. ++ + +++ +++ CAAAGA  81 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CAACGA  82 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CACAGC  83 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CACAGT  84 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CACCGC  85 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CAGAGA  86 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CATCGA  87 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CCAGGG  88 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CCATGC  89 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CCATGT  90 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CCCAGG  91 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CCCCGG  92 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CCCTGG  93 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CCTGGG  94 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGACGA  95 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGACGT  96 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGCAGG  97 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGCCGG  98 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGCTGG  99 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGGCGG 100 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGGTGG 101 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CGTGGG 102 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTAAGC 103 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTAGGG 104 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTATGA 105 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTGAGC 106 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTGCGA 107 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTGCGT 108 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTGGGG 109 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTGTGC 110 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTTAGC 111 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CTTTGC 112 n.d. ++ + ++ +++ CACTGC 113 n.d. ++ + + +++ CATGGA 114 n.d. ++ + + +++ CGAGGG 115 n.d. ++ + + +++ CGTAGC 116 n.d. ++ + + +++ CATCGT 117 n.d. ++ n.d. +++ +++

TABLE 5 Low and no activity of TevI chimeric endonucleases in yeast (37° C.) on a series of I-TevI cleavage sites. Activity of TevD02::cT11-AvrBs3, TevD02::b36-AvrBs3, TevM01::cT11-AvrBs3 and TevM01::b36-AvrBs3 on a series of targets (TG10RGAr_CNNGN; SEQ ID NO: 343) containing a CNNNGN motif (SEQ ID NO: 117 to SEQ ID NO: 256). The negative control consists in a TALE scaffold without any DNA binding domain. n.d. indicates no detectable activity, +++ indicates an activity over 0.7 and ++ indicates an activity between 0.5 and 0.7 , + indicates an activity between 03 and 0.5 in our assay (International PCT Applications WO 2004/067736 and in Epinat, Arnould et al. 2003; Chames, Epinat et al. 2005; Arnould, Chames et al. 2006; Smith, Grizot et al. 2006). I-TevI SEQ cleavage ID Neg. TevD02::cT11- TevD02::b36- TevM01::cT11- TevM01::b36- site NO Control AvrBs3 AvrBs3 AvrBs3 AvrBs3 CAAAGT 118 n.d. + + ++ +++ CACTGT 119 n.d. + + ++ +++ CCTTGT 120 n.d. + + ++ +++ CGATGT 121 n.d. + + ++ +++ CGTTGT 122 n.d. + + ++ ++ CTAAGT 123 n.d. + + ++ ++ CTGTGA 124 n.d. + + ++ +++ CTTAGT 125 n.d. + + ++ +++ CTTTGT 126 n.d. + + ++ +++ CAAGGT 127 n.d. + + + ++ CAGGGC 128 n.d. + + + +++ CATGGT 129 n.d. + + + +++ CCAAGC 130 n.d. + + + +++ CCATGA 131 n.d. + + + +++ CCGCGC 132 n.d. + + + +++ CCGCGT 133 n.d. + + + +++ CCGTGC 134 n.d. + + + +++ CCGTGT 135 n.d. + + + ++ CCTAGC 136 n.d. + + + +++ CCTCGC 137 n.d. + + + +++ CCTCGT 138 n.d. + + + ++ CCTTGC 139 n.d. + + + +++ CGAAGC 140 n.d. + + + +++ CGATGC 141 n.d. + + + +++ CGGTGC 142 n.d. + + + +++ CGGTGT 143 n.d. + + + ++ CGTAGT 144 n.d. + + + ++ CGTCGC 145 n.d. + + + +++ CGTTGC 146 n.d. + + + +++ CTCCGC 147 n.d. + + + +++ CTCGGG 148 n.d. + + + +++ CTCTGC 149 n.d. + + + ++ CTGAGT 150 n.d. + + + ++ CTTTGA 151 n.d. + + + ++ CACGGC 152 n.d. + + n.d. ++ CGCTGC 153 n.d. + + n.d. ++ CTTAGA 154 n.d. + n.d. ++ +++ CACCGA 155 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CACGGT 156 n.d. + n.d. + + CACTGA 157 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CAGGGT 158 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CCAAGT 159 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CCACGA 160 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CCGGGG 161 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CCTAGT 162 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CCTTGA 163 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CGAAGA 164 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CGATGA 165 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CGGAGC 166 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CGGCGT 167 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CGGTGA 168 n.d. + n.d. + + CGTAGA 169 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CGTCGA 170 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CGTCGT 171 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CGTTGA 172 n.d. + n.d. + + CTAAGA 173 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CTCAGC 174 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CTCAGT 175 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CTCCGT 176 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CTCTGT 177 n.d. + n.d. + + CTGAGA 178 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CTTCGA 179 n.d. + n.d. + +++ CTTGGC 180 n.d. + n.d. + ++ CAAGGC 181 n.d. + n.d. n.d. +++ CGGCGC 182 n.d. + n.d. n.d. +++ CACGGA 183 n.d. + n.d. n.d. ++ CCAAGA 184 n.d. + n.d. n.d. + CCCGGG 185 n.d. + n.d. n.d. ++ CCCGGT 186 n.d. + n.d. n.d. n.d. CCGAGC 187 n.d. + n.d. n.d. +++ CGCAGC 188 n.d. + n.d. n.d. ++ CGCGGG 189 n.d. + n.d. n.d. ++ CGGAGA 190 n.d. + n.d. n.d. + CGGAGT 191 n.d. + n.d. n.d. + CTAGGC 192 n.d. + n.d. n.d. +++ CTCAGA 193 n.d. + n.d. n.d. ++ CAGGGA 194 n.d. n.d. + n.d. ++ CCAGGT 195 n.d. n.d. + n.d. + CCCCGC 196 n.d. n.d. + n.d. ++ CCCTGC 197 n.d. n.d. + n.d. + CGCAGT 198 n.d. n.d. + n.d. + CACAGA 199 n.d. n.d. n.d. + ++ CCGTGA 200 n.d. n.d. n.d. + ++ CCTCGA 201 n.d. n.d. n.d. + ++ CAAGGA 202 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. +++ CCAGGA 203 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCAGGC 204 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CCCAGA 205 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCCAGC 206 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCCAGT 207 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCCCGA 208 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCCCGT 209 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CCCGGA 210 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. CCCGGC 211 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCCTGA 212 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCCTGT 213 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCGAGA 214 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCGAGT 215 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCGCGA 216 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CCGGGA 217 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCGGGC 218 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCGGGT 219 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCTAGA 220 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCTGGA 221 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CCTGGC 222 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CCTGGT 223 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGAAGT 224 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGAGGA 225 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGAGGC 226 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CGAGGT 227 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGCAGA 228 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGCCGA 229 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGCCGC 230 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CGCCGT 231 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGCGGA 232 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. CGCGGC 233 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGCGGT 234 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGCTGA 235 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGCTGT 236 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGGCGA 237 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CGGGGA 238 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGGGGC 239 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGGGGG 240 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGGGGT 241 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGTGGA 242 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CGTGGC 243 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CGTGGT 244 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTAGGA 245 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTAGGT 246 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTCCGA 247 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTCGGA 248 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTCGGC 249 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTCGGT 250 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTCTGA 251 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTGGGA 252 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTGGGC 253 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CTGGGT 254 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. + CTTGGA 255 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. ++ CTTGGT 256 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. +

Example 3b Spacer Specificity for Tev::TALE Cleavage in an In Vivo Yeast Assay

In order to address whether the sequence of the spacer between the Tevl cleavage motif and the TALE binding domain site could impact the activity of the Tev::TALE nuclease, we tested the TevM01::cT11 construct against a series of targets (TG10_CGACGG_NNN) containing a highly cut cleavage motif (CGACGG, SEQID NO: 17) separated from the T0 of the TALE recognition site TTGTATGCCAATCGAAT (SEQ ID NO: 344) by a spacer of 10 bp and differing by a NNN motif (with N=A, C, G or T) (SEQ ID NO: 346 to SEQ ID NO: 404) at the 3 first positions of their spacer (CGACGG_NNNGAAACT_TTGTATGCCAATCGAAT recognition site; with N=A, C, G or T; SEQ ID NO: 345). On the 64 theoretical targets, 59 were available and tested in our yeast assay (Table 6). A DNA binding array RVD_NNNT01g10 (SEQ ID NO: 405), targeting the TTGTATGCCAATCGAAT sequence, was synthesized and subcloned into TevM01::cT11 yeast expression plasmid (pCLS 20649, SEQ ID NO: 406) yielding plasmid pCLS 23422. The final pCLS23422 vector contains the coding sequence for TevM01::cT11-NNNT01g10 construct (SEQ ID NO: 407), which targets the TTGTATGCCAATCGAAT motif. The results of TevM01::cT11-NNNT01g10 activity on the series of TG10_CGACGG_NNN targets are presented in Table 6 and show that variations in the NNN three first bases of the spacer modulate the level of Tevl::TALE nuclease activity.

TABLE 6 Activity of TevM01 TALE nuclease in yeast (37° C.) on a serie of targets containing different spacer sequences. Activity of TevM01::cT11-NNNT01g10 on a serie of targets (TG10_CGACGG_NNN, SEQ ID NO: 346 to 404) containing the motif NNN at the three first positions of their 10 bp spacer. The negative control consists in an empty pCLS0542 plasmid (SEQ ID NO: 278). n.d. indicates no detectable activity, +++ indicates an activity over 0.7, ++ an activity between 0.5 and 0.7 in our assay (International PCT Applictaions WO 2004/067736 and in Epinat, arnould et al. 2003; Chames, Epinat et al.2005; Arnould, Chames et al. 2006; Smith, Grizot et al. 2006). Spacer SEQ (3 first ID Neg. TevM01::cT11- bases) NO: Control NNNT01g10 GCT 346 n.d. n.d. GAT 347 n.d. n.d. CGG 348 n.d. n.d. CAT 349 n.d. n.d. CCC 350 n.d. n.d. CCT 351 n.d. n.d. CGT 352 n.d. n.d. GGT 353 n.d. ++ GCG 354 n.d. ++ GGG 355 n.d. ++ CTC 356 n.d. ++ GTT 357 n.d. ++ CAG 358 n.d. ++ GAG 359 n.d. ++ CAC 360 n.d. ++ CTA 361 n.d. ++ GAC 362 n.d. ++ CTG 363 n.d. ++ CGC 364 n.d. ++ CCA 365 n.d. ++ CCG 366 n.d. ++ GCA 367 n.d. ++ CGA 368 n.d. ++ GGA 369 n.d. ++ ATT 370 n.d. ++ GTC 371 n.d. ++ GTG 372 n.d. ++ GTA 373 n.d. ++ TAT 374 n.d. ++ TTT 375 n.d. ++ GAA 376 n.d. +++ CAA 377 n.d. +++ ATC 378 n.d. +++ AAT 379 n.d. +++ ATA 380 n.d. +++ ACT 381 n.d. +++ TTA 382 n.d. +++ TAC 383 n.d. +++ ATG 384 n.d. +++ TTG 385 n.d. +++ ACC 386 n.d. +++ ACG 387 n.d. +++ TTC 388 n.d. +++ TAG 389 n.d. +++ TGT 390 n.d. +++ AGT 391 n.d. +++ TGG 392 n.d. +++ AAG 393 n.d. +++ TCA 394 n.d. +++ AAA 395 n.d. +++ AAC 396 n.d. +++ TGT 397 n.d. +++ TCG 398 n.d. +++ TCC 399 n.d. +++ TAA 400 n.d. +++ TGA 401 n.d. +++ AGA 402 n.d. +++ AGC 403 n.d. +++ TGC 404 n.d. +++

A statistical analysis of these results was then performed, showing that the nature of the first base of the target spacer has a significant impact on Tevl::TALE nuclease activity, with the bases A and T being the more favorable for cleavage activity (FIG. 1 a, ANOVA, p=2.3e¹⁰⁻⁸) whereas no significant impact of the nature of bases 2 and 3 of the spacer was observed (FIGS. 1 b and c respectively, ANOVA, p=0.8 and p=0.05).

Example 4 Activity of Tevl:TALE in Mammalian Cells Example 4A Activity of Tevl::cT11 in Mammalian Cells (CHO-K1) on a Chromosomal Target

The ability of Tevl::cT11 based nucleases to induce targeted mutagenesis on a chromosomal target was monitored using an engineered cell line (CHOpi-10, ref: patent US20120272348 A1) having a single integrated copy of a GFP-encoding sequence under the control of a CMV promoter. A DNA binding array was synthesized (RVD_ctEGFP_T03g12-L1; SEQ ID NO: 408) to target a unique sequence within the encoded GFP gene TGCCACCTACGGCAAGCTGACCCTGAAGTTCATCTGCACC [(SEQ ID NO: 409) comprising a preferential 1-Tevl cleavage site (in bold (SEQ ID NO: 18) spaced away from the TALE recognition site (in italic) thus allowing for measuring in vivo mutagenic activity via a reduction in GFP-positive cells as determined by flow cytometry.

To prepare a suitable vector for expression in mammalian cells, the core TevM01::cT11 scaffold insert was first transferred from pCLS7865-TevM01::cT11 to pCLS1853 (SEQ ID NO: 410) to create plasmid pCLS20650 (SEQ ID NO: 411). The DNA binding array insert from RVD_ctEGFP_T03g12-L1 was subcloned into pCLS20650, yielding plasmid pCLS20790. The final pCLS20790 vector contains the coding sequence for the Tevl::cT11EGfpT3g12 construct (SEQ ID NO: 412), which targets GFP and whose expression is controlled by a CMV promoter.

Transfection into the CHOpi-10 cell line was carried out using the Amaxa Nucleofector Kit T (Lonza) with a slightly modified protocol: 1 μg of sample plasmid was used in 1×10⁶ cells, in total of 7.25 μg DNA, complemented with pCLS0003 (SEQ ID NO: 413). Samples were additionally assayed with 2 μg of the enhancer reagent scTrex2 (pCLS8982; SEQ ID NO: 414) (WO2012138927). For baseline controls, plasmids pCLS0003 and pCLS8982 were individually tested in the absence of pCLS20790. Plasmid pCLS2198 containing blue fluorescent protein (BFP) (pCLS2198 (SEQ ID NO: 415)) was added (250 ng) to all samples to monitor uniformity of transfection. Upon transfection, cells were grown for three days (“Day3” samples) at 37° C. (5% CO₂) before being harvested in a volume of 5 ml each. A sample volume (150 μl) was transferred to a 96-well assay block and measured via flow cytometry using a MACSQuant Analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec).

FIG. 2 a illustrates the activity of the TevM01::cT11 construct measured as a reduction in GFP fluorescence.

Example 4b Optimization of the TALE Core Scaffold for Improvement of Tevl::TALE Activity on a Chromosomal Target in Mammalian Cells (CHO-K1)

In order to further improve Tevl::TALE activity in mammalian cells, several optimizations of the TAL core scaffold were tested. Three Nuclear localization Signals (NLS) and a HA tag allowing for protein detection, were added to the existing core scaffold TevM01::cT11 and to a new core scaffold TevM01::cT40, bearing a C40 truncation at its C-terminal part, leading respectively to TevM01::cT11N3H (SEQID NO: 418) and TevM01::cT40N3H (SEQID NO: 419) obtained from a provider in the puc57 plasmid (Genecust).

To prepare suitable vectors for expression in mammalian cells, the core TevM01::cT11N3H and TevM01::cT40N3H scaffolds were transferred from plasmid puc57 to pCLS 14975 (SEQ ID NO: 420) to create respectively pCLS 21563 and pCLS 21565. The DNA binding array RVD_ctEGFP_T03g12-L1 (SEQID NO: 408) was then subcloned into pCLS 21563 and pCLS21565 in order to monitor the targeted mutagenesis induced on the GFP integrated sequence in the CHOpi-10 cells described above. The subcloning of the GFP RVD into pCLS21563 and pCLS21565 yielded respectively to plasmids pCLS 22330 and pCLS 22332. The final pCLS 22330 and pCLS 22332 plasmids contain the coding sequences for the TevM01::cT11N3H_EGfpT3g12 construct (SEQ ID NO: 421) and for the TevM01::cT40N3H_EGfpT3g12 construct (SEQ ID NO: 422), which target GFP and whose expression is controlled by a CMV promoter.

Transfection into the CHOpi-10 cell-line was carried out using the amaxa Nucleofector kit T (Lonza) with 0.5 μg Tevl::TALE plasmids, complemented with pCLS003 (SEQ ID NO: 413). For baseline controls, plasmids pCLS003 (SEQ ID NO: 413) and pCLS20790 (SEQ ID NO: 412) were individually tested. Plasmid pCLS2198 containing blue fluorescent protein (BFP) (SEQ ID NO: 415) was added (500 ng) to all samples to monitor uniformity of transfection. Upon transfection, cells were grown for three days (“Day3” samples) at 37° C. (5% CO2) before being harvested in a volume of 5 ml each. A sample volume (1500 was transferred to a 96-well assay block and measured via flow cytometry using a MACSQuant analyser (Miltenyl Biotec).

FIG. 2 b illustrates the activity of the TevM01::cT11N3H and TevM01:: cT40N3H constructs compared to TevM01::cT11 construct measured as a reduction in GFP fluorescence. It shows an improvement of mutagenic activity for TevM01::cT11N3H and TevM01:: cT40N3H with optimal activity detected for TevM01::cT40N3H construct.

Example 4c Activity of Tevl::TALE Fused to the Enhancer Reagent scTrex2 in Mammalian Cells (HEK-293)

As the targeted mutagenesis activity of Tevl::TALE in mammalian cells was shown to be improved by scTrex2 reagent (pCSL8982; SEQ ID NO: 414) (see Example 4a), a single-chain Tevl::TALE::scTrex2 fusion was designed and tested in Human 293H cells (HEK-293). The first monomer of the scTrex2 was amplified by PCR on template pCLS8982 with the primer pair CMP_M001 (SEQ ID NO: 423) and CMP_M002 (SEQ ID NO: 424) containing respectively EcoRI and AgeI restriction sites. The second monomer of the scTrex2 was amplified by PCR on template pCLS8982 with the primer pair CMP_M003 (SEQ ID NO: 425) and CMP_M004 (SEQ ID NO: 426) containing respectively restriction sites AgeI and EagI. The two PCR inserts were then cloned into pCLS21565 by restriction and ligation using EcoRI and EagI restriction sites, yielding TevM01::cT40N3::scTrex2, pCLS 25202 (SEQ ID NO: 427). A DNA binding array (RVD_cTCD52_T02g10, SEQ ID NO: 428) was synthesized to target a unique sequence within the CAMPATH-1 antigen (CD52) gene in human cells TCCTGGCAGTGGTGCCAGGCGTTGCTCTTACCTGTACCA (SEQ ID NO: 429) comprising a preferential I-Tevl cleavage site (in bold (SEQ ID NO: 10)) spaced away from the TALE recognition site (in italic, SEQ ID NO: 430) allowing for measuring in vivo mutagenic activity via a PCR surrounding the targeted endogenous locus followed by an EndoT7 assay (Reyon, Tsai et al. 2012).

To prepare a suitable vector for expression in mammalian cells, the DNA binding array insert from RVD_cTCD52_T02g10 was subcloned into pCLS21565 and pCLS25202, yielding respectively plasmids pCLS24059 and pCLS25203. The final pCLS24059 vector contains the coding sequence for the Tevl::cT40n3HCD52T02g10 construct (SEQ ID NO: 431) and the final pCLS 25203 vector contains the coding sequence for the Tevl::cT40n3H::sc-Trex2CD52T02g10 construct (SEQ ID NO: 432), which target CD52 and whose expression is controlled by a CMV promoter. HEK-293 cells (Life Technologies) were cultured at 37° C. with 5% CO₂ in DMEM complete medium supplemented with 2 mM I-glutamine, penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), amphotericin B (Fongizone: 0.25 μg/ml, Life Technologies,) and 10% FBS. 293H cells were seeded at 1.2 10⁶ cells in 10 cm Petri dishes one day before transfection. Cell transfection was performed using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). 0.5 μg of the plasmids Tevl::cT40n3H::sc-Trex2CD52T02g10 and 500 ng of GFP expression vector (to monitor transfection efficiencies) were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS (5 μg final DNA amount). In another tube 25 μL of Lipofectamine were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS. After 5 minutes incubation, both DNA and Lipofectamine mixes were combined and incubated for 25 min at RT. The mixture was transferred to a Petri dish containing the 293H cells in 9 ml of complete and then cultured at 37° C. under 5% CO₂. Three days post-transfection, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), trypsinized, resuspended in 5 ml complete medium and the percentage of GFP positive cells was measured by flow cytometry (Guava EasyCyte) in order to monitor transfection efficacy. For baseline controls, pCLS 24059 with or without the addition of pCLS8982 (SEQID NO: 414) and pCLS003 were individually tested. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation and genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR of the CD52 endogenous locus (393 bp, SEQ ID NO: 459) was performed using the oligonucleotide sequences CMP_M005 (SEQ ID NO: 433) and CMP_M006 (SEQ ID NO: 434) and purified using the AMPure kit (Invitrogen). To detect mutagenic events, amplicons were further digested with an Endo T7 endonuclease as described in (Reyon, Tsai et al. 2012).

FIG. 2 c illustrates the target mutagenesis induced by the Tevl::TALE::scTrex2 fusion

Example 4d Targeted Gene Correction Induced by Optimized Tevl::TALE in Mammalian Cells (HEK-293)

In order to evaluate if Tevl::TALE could promote targeted gene insertion (TGI) at the CD52 endogenous locus by inducing homology-directed repair via double-strand break, a repair matrix consisting in a single-stranded oligonucleotide composed of two homologous arms (50 bp each) separated by 29 bp of an exogenous sequence was designed (SEQ ID NO: 435). Using a homologous recombination (HR) based strategy (Daboussi, Zaslayskiy et al. 2012), specific insertions induced by the Tevl::TALE CD52T02g10 were monitored. In our experimental setup, the cells were reseeded three days post transfection at a density of 10 cells/well in a 96-well plate, a strategy that was previously validated for designer nucleases (Daboussi, Zaslayskiy et al. 2012). Human 293H cells (Life Technologies) were cultured at 37° C. with 5% CO₂ in DMEM complete medium supplemented with 2 mM I-glutamine, penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), amphotericin B (Fongizone: 0.25 μg/ml, Life Technologies,) and 10% FBS. 293H cells were seeded at 1.2 10⁶ cells in 10 cm Petri dishes one day before transfection. Cell transfection was performed using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). 0.5 μg of Tevl::TALE nuclease expression vector with 2 μg of single-stranded oligo donor matrix, and 500 ng of GFP expression vector (to monitor transfection efficiencies) were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS (3 μg final DNA amount). In another tube 25 μL of Lipofectamine were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS. After 5 minutes incubation, both DNA and Lipofectamine mixes were combined and incubated for 25 min at RT. The mixture was transferred to a Petri dish containing the 293H cells in 9 ml of complete and then cultured at 37° C. under 5% CO₂. We monitored targeted integration by performing, eighteen days post-transfection, for each well (288 wells in total), a locus specific PCR amplification using the Herculase II Fusion kit (Agilent), with one primer CMP_M007 (SEQ ID NO: 436) located within the heterologous insert of the donor DNA and the other CMP_(—)008 (SEQ ID NO: 437) located in the genomic sequence outside of the homology arms. To evaluate the targeted gene insertion (TGI) frequency, we took into account the transfection efficiency (as monitored via GFP positive cells percentage) and plating efficiency (estimated at 30%).

FIG. 2 d illustrates the TGI activity of the Tevl::TALE on the endogenous target CD52 in HEK-293 cells.

Example 5 Activity of Tevl::b36 in Mammalian Cells Example 5a Activity of Tevl::b36 in Mammalian Cells (CHO-K1) on a Chromosomal Target

The ability of Tevl::b36 based nucleases to induce targeted mutagenesis on a chromosomal target was monitored using an engineered cell line (CHOpi-10, ref: patent US20120272348 A1) having a single integrated copy of a GFP-encoding sequence under the control of a CMV promoter. A DNA binding array was synthesized (RVD_bhEGFP_T03g06; SEQ ID NO: 416) to target a unique sequence within the encoded GFP gene [(TGCCACCTACGGCAAGCTGACCCTGAAGTTCATCTGCACC (SEQ ID NO: 409) comprising a preferential I-Tevl cleavage site (in bold (SEQ ID NO: 18)) spaced away from the MBBBD recognition site (in italic), thus allowing for measuring in vivo mutagenic activity via a reduction in GFP-positive cells as determined by flow cytometry.

To prepare a suitable vector for expression in mammalian cells, the core TevM01::b36 scaffold insert was first transferred from pCLS7865-TevM01::b36 to pCLS1853 (SEQ ID NO: 410) to create plasmid pCLS21536. The DNA binding array insert from pCLS19333 was subcloned into pCLS21536, yielding plasmid pCLS20293. The final pCLS20293 vector contains the coding sequence for the Tevl::b36EGfpT3g6 construct (SEQ ID NO: 417), which targets GFP and whose expression is controlled by a CMV promoter.

Transfection into the CHOpi-10 cell line was carried out using the Amaxa Nucleofector Kit T (Lonza) with a slightly modified protocol: 1 μg of sample plasmid was used in 1×10⁶ cells, in total of 7.25 μg DNA, complemented with pCLS0003 (SEQ ID NO: 413). Samples were additionally assayed with 2 μg of the enhancer reagent scTrex2 (pCLS8982; SEQ ID NO: 414)(WO2012138927). For baseline controls, plasmids pCLS0003 and pCLS8982 were individually tested in the absence of pCLS20293. Plasmid pCLS2198 containing blue fluorescent protein (BFP) (pCLS2198 (SEQ ID NO: 415)) was added (250 ng) to all samples to monitor uniformity of transfection. Upon transfection, cells were grown for three days (“Day3” samples) at 37° C. (5% CO₂) before being harvested in a volume of 5 ml each. A sample volume (150 μl) was transferred to a 96-well assay block and measured via flow cytometry using a MACSQuant Analyzer (Miltenyi Biotec). FIG. 3 a illustrates the activity of the TevM01::b36 construct measured as a reduction in GFP fluorescence.

Example 5b Optimization of Tevl::b36 Activity in Mammalian Cells (HEK-293)

In order to further improve Tevl::b36 activity in mammalian cells, several optimizations of the BurrH core scaffold were tested. To increase the nuclear addressing of the BurrH nuclease, three Nuclear localization Signals (NLS) and a HA tag allowing for protein detection were added to the Tevl::b36 core scaffold leading to Tevl::b36N3H scaffold. To prepare suitable vectors for expression in mammalian cells, the core Tevl::b36N3H scaffold (SEQ ID NO: 438) was transferred from puc57 to pCLS 14975 (SEQ ID NO: 420) to create pCLS 25472. In order to monitor the targeted mutagenesis induced on SH6 endogenous sequence in HEK-293 cells, a DNA binding array RVD_bhSH6_T03g06_(—)16 containing 16 BurrH modules (SEQ ID NO: 439) targeting a unique sequence in the SH6 gene TTTCATCATAGGTAAACTGGGATGCTATACTGGT [(SEQ ID NO: 440) comprising a preferential I-Tevl cleavage site (in bold (SEQ ID NO: 12)) spaced away from the BurrH recognition site (in italic) was then subcloned into Tevl::b36N3H plasmid (pCLS 25472) yielding to pCLS24674 and into Tevl::36-pCLS21536) yielding to pCLS24670 for internal control. The final pCLS 24674 plasmid contains the coding sequence for the TevM01::b36N3H_SH6T03g06_(—)16 construct (SEQ ID NO: 441) and the final pCLS24670 contains the coding sequence for TevM01::b36_SH6T03g06_(—)16 (SEQ ID NO: 442) which both target SH6 gene and whose expression is controlled by a CMV promoter. Another DNA binding array RVD_bhSH6_T03g06_(—)20 (SEQ ID NO: 443) composed, as in the natural BurrH protein, of modules, and targeting a unique sequence in the SH6 gene TTTCATCATAGGTAAACTGGGATGCTATACTGGTAGAA (SEQ ID NO: 444) comprising a preferential I-Tevl cleavage site (in bold (SEQID NO: 12)) spaced away from the BurrH recognition site (in italic) was also synthesized and subcloned into pCLS25472 yielding to pCLS24677. The final pCLS24677 plasmid contains the coding sequence for the TevM01::b36N3H_SH6T03g06_(—)20 construct (SEQ ID NO: 445) which targets SH6 gene and whose expression is controlled by a CMV promoter.

In our experimental set up to monitor Targeted Mutagenesis (TM), Human 293H cells (Life Technologies) were cultured at 37° C. with 5% CO₂ in DMEM complete medium supplemented with 2 mM I-glutamine, penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), amphotericin B (Fongizone: 0.25 μg/ml, Life Technologies,) and 10% FBS. 293H cells were seeded at 1.2 10⁶ cells in 10 cm Petri dishes one day before transfection. Cell transfection was performed using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). 0.5 μg of Tevl::b36 nuclease expression vectors and 500 ng of GFP expression vector (to monitor transfection efficiencies) completed with 3 μg of pCLS003 were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS (5 μg final DNA amount). In another tube, 25 μL of Lipofectamine were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS. After 5 minutes incubation, both DNA and Lipofectamine mixes were combined and incubated for 25 min at RT. The mixture was transferred to a Petri dish containing the 293H cells in 9 ml of complete and then cultured at 37° C. under 5% CO₂. Three days post-transfection, cells were pelleted by centrifugation and genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A PCR of the SH6 endogenous locus (351 bp, SEQ ID NO: 446) was performed using the oligonucleotides CMP_(—)009 (SEQID NO: 447) and CMP_(—)010 (SEQ ID NO: 448) and purified using the AMPure kit (Invitrogen). Amplicons were further analyzed by an EndoT7 assay to monitor the percentage of induced TM events.

FIG. 3 b illustrates the targeted mutagenesis activity of different scaffolds for Tevl::b36 showing an optimal activity for Tevl::b36N3H containing 20 modules for DNA targeting.

Example 5c Targeted Gene Insertion Induced by Optimized Tevl::b36 in Mammalian Cells (HEK-293)

In order to evaluate if Tevl::b36 could promote targeted gene insertion (TGI) at the SH6 endogenous locus by inducing homology-directed repair via double-strand break, a repair matrix consisting in a donor DNA, cloned in a plasmid, and composed of two homologous arms (1 kb each) separated by 29 bp of an exogenous sequence was designed (pCLS 23895 SEQ ID NO: 449). Using a homologous recombination (HR) based strategy (Daboussi, Zaslayskiy et al. 2012), specific insertions induced by the TevM01::b36N3H_SH6T03g06_(—)20 were monitored using for baseline controls, the pCLS003 transfected with donor matrix pCLS 23895. In our experimental setup, the cells were reseeded three days post transfection at a density of 10 cells/well in a 96-well plate, a strategy that was previously validated for designer nucleases (Daboussi, Zaslayskiy et al. 2012). Human 293H cells (Life Technologies) were cultured at 37° C. with 5% CO₂ in DMEM complete medium supplemented with 2 mM I-glutamine, penicillin (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), amphotericin B (Fongizone: 0.25 μg/ml, Life Technologies,) and 10% FBS. 293H cells were seeded at 1.2 10⁶ cells in 10 cm Petri dishes one day before transfection. Cell transfection was performed using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). 0.5 μg of Tevl::BurrH nuclease expression vector with 2 μg of plasmidic donor matrix, and 500 ng of GFP expression vector (to monitor transfection efficiencies) were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS (3 μg final DNA amount). In another tube 25 μL of Lipofectamine were mixed with 0.3 ml of DMEM without FBS. After 5 minutes incubation, both DNA and Lipofectamine mixes were combined and incubated for 25 min at RT. The mixture was transferred to a Petri dish containing the 293H cells in 9 ml of complete and then cultured at 37° C. under 5% CO₂. We monitored targeted integration by performing, eighteen days post-transfection, for each well (288 wells in total), a locus specific PCR amplification using the Herculase II Fusion kit (Agilent), with one primer CMP_M011 (SEQ ID NO: 450) located within the heterologous insert of the donor DNA and the other CMP_(—)012 (SEQ ID NO: 451) located on the genomic sequence outside of the homology arms. To evaluate the targeted gene insertion (TGI) frequency, we took into account the transfection efficiency (as monitored via GFP positive cells percentage) and plating efficiency (estimated at 30%).

FIG. 2 c illustrates the targeted gene insertion activity for Tevl::b36 on SH6 endogenous target in HEK-293 cells.

REFERENCES

-   Arimondo, P. B., C. J. Thomas, et al. (2006). “Exploring the     cellular activity of camptothecin-triple-helix-forming     oligonucleotide conjugates.” Mol Cell Biol 26(1): 324-33. -   Arnould, S., P. Chames, et al. (2006). “Engineering of large numbers     of highly specific homing endonucleases that induce recombination on     novel DNA targets.” J Mol Biol 355(3): 443-58. -   Arnould, S., C. Delenda, et al. (2011). “The I-Crel meganuclease and     its engineered derivatives: applications from cell modification to     gene therapy.” Protein Eng Des Sel 24(1-2): 27-31. -   Arnould, S., C. Perez, et al. (2007). “Engineered I-Crel derivatives     cleaving sequences from the human XPC gene can induce highly     efficient gene correction in mammalian cells.” J Mol Biol 371(1):     49-65. -   Bitinaite, J., D. A. Wah, et al. (1998). “Fokl dimerization is     required for DNA cleavage.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(18): 10570-5. -   Boch, J., H. Scholze, et al. (2009). “Breaking the code of DNA     binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors.” Science 326(5959):     1509-12. -   Chames, P., J. C. Epinat, et al. (2005). “In vivo selection of     engineered homing endonucleases using double-strand break induced     homologous recombination.” Nucleic Acids Res 33(20): e178. -   Choulika, A., A. Perrin, et al. (1995). “Induction of homologous     recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-Scel system of     Saccharomyces cerevisiae.” Mol Cell Biol 15(4): 1968-73. -   Christian, M., T. Cermak, et al. (2010). “Targeting DNA     double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases.” Genetics 186(2):     757-61. -   Critchlow, S. E. and S. P. Jackson (1998). “DNA end-joining: from     yeast to man.” Trends Biochem Sci 23(10): 394-8. -   Daboussi, F., M. Zaslayskiy, et al. (2012). “Chromosomal context and     epigenetic mechanisms control the efficacy of genome editing by     rare-cutting designer endonucleases.” Nucleic Acids Res. -   Dean, A. B., M. J. Stanger, et al. (2002). “Zinc finger as distance     determinant in the flexible linker of intron endonuclease I-Tevl.”     Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(13): 8554-61. -   Edgell, D. R., M. J. Stanger, et al. (2004). “Coincidence of     cleavage sites of intron endonuclease I-Tevl and critical sequences     of the host thymidylate synthase gene.” J Mol Biol 343(5): 1231-41. -   Eisenschmidt, K., T. Lanio, et al. (2005). “Developing a programmed     restriction endonuclease for highly specific DNA cleavage.” Nucleic     Acids Res 33(22): 7039-47. -   Epinat, J. C., S. Arnould, et al. (2003). “A novel engineered     meganuclease induces homologous recombination in yeast and mammalian     cells.” Nucleic Acids Res 31(11): 2952-62. -   Kalish, J. M. and P. M. Glazer (2005). “Targeted genome modification     via triple helix formation.” Ann N Y Acad Sci 1058: 151-61. -   Kim, Y. G., J. Cha, et al. (1996). “Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc     finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA     93(3): 1156-60. -   Kleinstiver, B. P., J. M. Wolfs, et al. (2012). “Monomeric     site-specific nucleases for genome editing.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA     109(21): 8061-6. -   Lackner, G., N. Moebius, et al. (2011). “Complete genome sequence of     Burkholderia rhizoxinica, an Endosymbiont of Rhizopus microsporus.”     J Bacteriol 193(3): 783-4. -   Li, T., S. Huang, et al. (2011). “TAL nucleases (TALNs): hybrid     proteins composed of TAL effectors and Fokl DNA-cleavage domain.”     Nucleic Acids Res 39(1): 359-72. -   Li, T., S. Huang, et al. (2011). “Modularly assembled designer TAL     effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement     in eukaryotes.” Nucleic Acids Res 39(14): 6315-25. -   Ma, J. L., E. M. Kim, et al. (2003). “Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins     define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks     lacking overlapping end sequences.” Mol Cell Biol 23(23): 8820-8. -   Marcaida, M. J., I. G. Munoz, et al. (2010). “Homing endonucleases:     from basics to therapeutic applications.” Cell Mol Life Sci 67(5):     727-48. -   Moscou, M. J. and A. J. Bogdanove (2009). “A simple cipher governs     DNA recognition by TAL effectors.” Science 326(5959): 1501. -   Mueller, J. E., D. Smith, et al. (1995). “Intron-encoded     endonuclease I-Tevl binds as a monomer to effect sequential cleavage     via conformational changes in the td homing site.” Embo J 14(22):     5724-35. -   Pabo, C. O., E. Peisach, et al. (2001). “Design and selection of     novel Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins.” Annu Rev Biochem 70: 313-40. -   Paques, F. and P. Duchateau (2007). “Meganucleases and DNA     double-strand break-induced recombination: perspectives for gene     therapy.” Curr Gene Ther 7(1): 49-66. -   Pingoud, A. and G. H. Silva (2007). “Precision genome surgery.” Nat     Biotechnol 25(7): 743-4. -   Pingoud, A. and W. Wende (2011). “Generation of novel nucleases with     extended specificity by rational and combinatorial strategies.”     Chembiochem 12(10): 1495-500. -   Porteus, M. H. and D. Carroll (2005). “Gene targeting using zinc     finger nucleases.” Nat Biotechnol 23(8): 967-73. -   Reyon, D., S. Q. Tsai, et al. (2012). “FLASH assembly of TALENs for     high-throughput genome editing.” Nat Biotechnol 30(5): 460-5. -   Rouet, P., F. Smih, et al. (1994). “Expression of a site-specific     endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian     cells.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(13): 6064-8. -   Rouet, P., F. Smih, et al. (1994). “Introduction of double-strand     breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a     rare-cutting endonuclease.” Mol Cell Biol 14(12): 8096-106. -   Silva, G., L. Poirot, et al. (2011). “Meganucleases and other tools     for targeted genome engineering: perspectives and challenges for     gene therapy.” Curr Gene Ther 11(1): 11-27. -   Simon, P., F. Cannata, et al. (2008). “Sequence-specific DNA     cleavage mediated by bipyridine polyamide conjugates.” Nucleic Acids     Res 36(11): 3531-8. -   Smith, J., J. M. Berg, et al. (1999). “A detailed study of the     substrate specificity of a chimeric restriction enzyme.” Nucleic     Acids Res 27(2): 674-81. -   Smith, J., M. Bibikova, et al. (2000). “Requirements for     double-strand cleavage by chimeric restriction enzymes with zinc     finger DNA-recognition domains.” Nucleic Acids Res 28(17): 3361-9. -   Smith, J., S. Grizot, et al. (2006). “A combinatorial approach to     create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences.”     Nucleic Acids Res 34(22): e149. -   Stoddard, B. L. (2005). “Homing endonuclease structure and     function.” Q Rev Biophys 38(1): 49-95. -   Stoddard, B. L., R. J. Monnat, et al. (2007). “Advances in     engineering homing endonucleases for gene targeting: ten years after     structures.” Progress in Gene Therapy: AUtologous: 135-167. -   Zhao, L., R. P. Bonocora, et al. (2007). “The restriction fold turns     to the dark side: a bacterial homing endonuclease with a PD-(D/E)-XK     motif.” Embo J 26(9): 2432-42. 

1. A method for generating a TevI chimeric endonuclease comprising the steps of: a. determining a target nucleic acid sequence comprising a I-TevI cleavage site selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO 117; b. selecting or engineering at least one nucleic acid binding domain to specifically bind a recognition site adjacent to said cleavage site; c. fusing said nucleic acid binding domain with at least one catalytic domain of I-TevI.
 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said cleavage site is selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 2 to
 55. 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein said I-TevI catalytic domain protein sequence is a part of the protein sequence SEQ ID NO: 257
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein said I-TevI catalytic domain protein sequence is selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 268 and SEQ ID NO:
 284. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein said I-TevI catalytic domain protein sequence shares at least 80% protein sequence identity with a protein sequence selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 268 and SEQ ID NO:
 284. 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein said DNA nucleic acid binding domain is an engineered MBBBD binding domain.
 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein said DNA binding domain is an engineered TALE binding domain comprising a plurality of TALE like repeat sequences, each repeat comprising a RVD specific to each nucleotide base of a TALE DNA binding site.
 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein said I-TevI catalytic domain is fused to the N-terminal part of said nucleic acid binding domain.
 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein said I-TevI catalytic domain is fused to the C-terminal part of said nucleic acid binding domain.
 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein said I-TevI catalytic domain is fused to said nucleic acid binding domain by a peptide linker.
 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein said TevI chimeric endonuclease is selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 452 to
 458. 12. The method according to claim 1, wherein said target nucleic acid sequence comprises said recognition site spaced away from said I-TevI cleavage site by an optimal distance to increase cleavage activity.
 13. The method according to claim 12, wherein T₀ of said TALE nucleic acid recognition site is located between 5 to 20 bp, preferably between 6 to 12 bp, more preferably 10 bp away from terminal G base of said I-TevI cleavage site.
 14. The method according to claim 1, wherein said target nucleic acid sequence comprises a nucleotide A or T after the terminal G base of said I-TevI cleavage site.
 15. A TevI chimeric endonuclease obtained from the method according to claim
 1. 16. A TevI chimeric endonuclease having at least 80% amino acid sequence identity with a protein sequence selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 452 to
 458. 17. A method to selectively cleave a target nucleic acid by using catalytic domain of I-TevI, said method comprising: a. selecting a target nucleic acid sequence comprising a cleavage site selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 2 to SEQ ID NO 117, preferably SEQ ID NO: 2 to 55; b. selecting or engineering a nucleic acid binding domain to specifically bind a recognition site adjacent to said cleavage site; c. fusing said nucleic acid binding domain with said catalytic domain of I-TevI to obtain a TevI chimeric endonuclease; d. contacting said target nucleic acid with said chimeric endonuclease.
 18. The method according to claim 17, further comprising a step of introducing said cleavage site selected in step a) into said target nucleic acid in order to be cleaved by said TevI chimeric endonuclease.
 19. A method to process a target nucleic acid sequence in a cell comprising: a. generating a TevI chimeric endonuclease according to claim 1; b. introducing said TevI chimeric endonuclease into said cell.
 20. The method according to claim 19, further comprising providing to the cell an exogeneous nucleic acid comprising a sequence homologous to at least a portion of the target nucleic acid sequence, such that homologous recombination occurs between the target DNA sequence and the exogeneous nucleic acid.
 21. The method according to claim 19, to increase mutagenesis, further comprising a step of providing and contacting an additional catalytic domain with the target nucleic acid sequence.
 22. The method of claim 21, wherein said catalytic domain is a DNA end-processing enzyme.
 23. The method of claim 22 wherein said DNA end-processing enzyme is Trex2.
 24. The method of claim 23 wherein said DNA processing enzyme is a single chain Trex2.
 25. The method according to claim 19, wherein said cell is an animal or plant cell.
 26. The method according to claim 25, wherein the cell is a plant cell and further comprising developing the plant cell into a whole plant.
 27. The method according to claim 25, wherein said animal cell is a progenitor cell and further comprising obtaining a transgenic animal from said progenitor cell. 